If GM Fails, Then What?

If GM Fails, Then What? http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-gm23apr23,1,424116.story?coll=la-headlines-business&ctrack=1&cset=true
If GM Fails, Then What? The carmaker says it has no intention of entering Chapter 11, but some analysts say a bankruptcy filing in the next few years is a definite possibility. The ripple effects on the economy would be huge
By Tom Petruno and John O'Dell, Times Staff Writers April 23, 2006
Ponying up more than $100,000 of their own money, three dozen General Motors Corp. dealers nationwide this month bought full-page newspaper ads imploring the public to give GM a chance.
"For the good of everyone, they must succeed and they need our help," the ad read. "We pledge ours. We hope you will do the same."
For most of GM's 98-year history, that kind of plea would have been unimaginable. But now, the company long synonymous with U.S. industrial might is scrambling to avoid something else once unimaginable: bankruptcy.
GM executives, including Chief Executive Rick Wagoner, say they have no intention of filing for bankruptcy protection, and no need to do so.
On Thursday, the company reported a $323 million first quarter loss, a sharp improvement from recent quarters and an "important milestone" in the automaker's turnaround plan, Wagoner said.
But some veteran industry analysts say GM's fundamental problems of high labor costs and falling market share are so severe that there is a serious risk that the auto giant will enter Bankruptcy Court in the next few years. Any number of events could be the tipping point - another surge in oil and gasoline prices, a recession brought on by rising interest rates or a strike by GM's main parts supplier, which already is operating under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
For the world's largest automaker and its vast constituencies, the prospect of a bankruptcy filing is so daunting that even many of Wagoner's critics hope his revival program works.
A GM bankruptcy filing would be the largest in history, challenging Wall Street, organized labor, politicians and the legal system to deal with the fallout.
GM's 147,000 workers in the U.S. and 460,000 retirees would face the prospect of their pension plans' being dumped on the federal government and of seeing their future benefits reduced.
Stock and bond markets could be upended, at least temporarily. GM shareholders, including billionaire Kirk Kerkorian, who owns 9.9% of GM, could lose every penny of their investments in the carmaker. Meanwhile, the company's bondholders, banks and other creditors would face unknown losses on $33 billion of debt.
Almost certainly, a GM bankruptcy filing would have enormous repercussions for the entire U.S. auto industry, which still directly employs about 1 million Americans, many of them in the Midwest.
Several big auto parts suppliers already are in financial reorganization. If GM joined them, it would raise the possibility of a domino effect of additional failures throughout the industry - including Ford Motor Co., some analysts say.
Although the public has witnessed some colossal corporate busts in recent years, "I would not underestimate the effect on the American psyche" of GM in Chapter 11, said Steven Roach, an economist at brokerage Morgan Stanley in New York.
The shock effects would ripple through the economy, from assembly lines to auto insurance offices, from Midwest shopping malls to global financial capitals.
For GM's 7,300 U.S. dealers, an immediate worry would be that sales might halt.
GM in bankruptcy would be "really uncharted territory," said Leonard Renick, owner of Renick Cadillac in Fullerton.
In terms of his ability to keep customers coming through the door, "It couldn't be good," Renick said. "I think it would be pretty devastating."
For all of its problems, GM still accounts for about 1 of every 4 passenger vehicles sold in the U.S. Its worldwide sales were $193 billion in 2005, ranking third on the Fortune 500 list.
But GM lost $10.6 billion last year, and Asian rivals have been taking market share from the company for decades.
Since last fall, GM has been trying to shrink its way back to health by closing a dozen plants and offering cash buyouts and retirement incentives to all 113,000 of its U.S. hourly workers, hoping to get a large number of them off the payroll. The company also has struck a deal with the United Auto Workers to trim retiree healthcare costs. Even so, by some estimates GM is draining $13 million a day.
"The current path is simply unsustainable," said Sean Egan, managing director of credit-rating firm Egan-Jones Ratings Co. in Haverford, Pa. He predicts GM will be in Bankruptcy Court within two years.
Chapter 11 is designed to give a troubled company breathing room while it restructures. Debts are instantly suspended, and the company operates under court oversight and protection while it tries to work out its problems.
In that sense, a filing by GM might seem a logical step for a business that is battling to reinvent itself. Major airlines and telecommunication firms have sought bankruptcy protection in recent years, and their customers have stuck with them.
But apart from a home, a car is the most expensive item most consumers buy. They expect big-ticket goods to last for years and for the manufacturer to be around to service them. In bankruptcy protection, GM would have to convince consumers that it wasn't going away.
Renick, the Fullerton dealer, said he would expect to tough it out if sales withered initially because of a GM Chapter 11 filing. His dealership, which his father founded as a Packard franchise in 1952, employs about 80 people.
But he wasn't sure what GM's strategy would be to lure people back into the showrooms. "Would GM be willing to slash prices? I doubt it. They've already done it across the board," Renick said.
Roy Adler, a marketing professor and consumer-attitude specialist at Pepperdine University, said it would be hard to overcome peoples' fears.
"The quality of most cars is really close now, so if I've got $25,000 and there are four or five other carmakers with competing products and they aren't in bankruptcy, then I've got a lot less risk going to one of them" instead of a company in Chapter 11, he said.
The stigma of bankruptcy would affect used GM cars too, said Maryann Keller, an independent auto industry analyst in Greenwich, Conn. "Every owner of a GM car would suffer an immediate loss of value," she said.
GM would be forced to drop sticker prices to draw customers, Keller said.
"There's only one way to compensate consumers for the risk, and that's by cutting the price," she said.
GM also would need to project a hopeful message in its post-bankruptcy advertising, Adler said.
"They would have to avoid the B-word," he said, "and craft a pretty dramatic message that said they were going to be stronger than ever with the streamlining they were doing."
Adler suggested that GM might take a page from South Korea's Hyundai Motor Co. and provide a 10-year service warranty on cars and trucks, with the funding to back up those warranties held in a trust by a large financial institution.
In addition, Adler said, the company "would have to promise exciting new cars were coming soon, and show some examples, and they'd have to promise an expanded commitment to serving GM owners."
Lee Iacocca did that for Chrysler Corp. in the late-1970s and early-1980s, after it avoided bankruptcy with a $1.5-billion federal loan guarantee. "He was able to keep sales from faltering by wrapping himself in the flag, going on TV and pitching those cars," Keller said.
But that was a different era, she said, when manufacturing was a larger part of the U.S. economy and Chrysler's woes struck a patriotic nerve. Today, Japanese cars outsell GM's models in the U.S.
"Rick Wagoner couldn't do what Iacocca did," Keller said.
Much of what might happen to GM in bankruptcy will happen in any case, many analysts say. One way or another, "The old GM is going away. It will be a totally different company," said Sean McAlinden, an economist at the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Mich.
But for GM workers and their families, bankruptcy could instantly intensify uncertainty about their future. No job would be safe, because the shape of a new GM wouldn't be management's decision alone. Creditors would have to agree to the company's reorganization plan, and a Bankruptcy Court judge would have final say-so.
Wagoner, who has been GM's CEO for six years and has been widely criticized for not dealing with the company's problems sooner, says the game plan to stay solvent is to continue hacking expenses. The company says it is on track to reduce North American structural costs - including union labor expenses - by $7 billion a year.
GM also is raising capital by selling long-held stakes in foreign auto makers such as Fiat and 51% of its profitable financing subsidiary, General Motors Acceptance Corp.
But cost cutting alone won't save GM, many analysts say. In recent months, sales have continued to decline despite the company's restructuring moves.
In or out of bankruptcy, Wagoner must decide which GM car and truck brands to keep, which plants to close and how much the company can profitably afford in wages and benefits.
Last year, GM Vice Chairman Robert Lutz called Pontiac and Buick "damaged brands." Since then, they frequently have been mentioned as divisions that GM might shed. A bankruptcy filing could speed up the process.
GM now has eight brands, and "that's just too many mouths to feed," said Eric Noble, president of CarLab market research in Orange.
That analogy also applies to GM's workforce.
As so-called legacy costs for retirees' pensions and healthcare expenses have mounted over the last 20 years, GM's competitive disadvantage compared with foreign rivals has ballooned.
Its U.S. labor costs averaged $74 an hour in wages and benefits last year, compared with $48 for Toyota's U.S. labor force. GM said it spent $5.4 billion last year on healthcare alone.
If GM and the auto workers union can't agree on how to cut labor costs so that GM can be consistently profitable, and bankruptcy follows, a federal judge ultimately will make the decision.
On that issue, Delphi Corp. may be a prelude to how a GM bankruptcy would unfold.
Delphi, an auto parts supplier spun off by GM in 1999, filed for Chapter 11 protection last October. Delphi wants to slash hourly union wages by 40%. The auto workers union has balked. Two weeks ago, Delphi took the radical step of asking the Bankruptcy Court's permission to void its labor contracts and modify retiree benefits.
The union warned that if the court agreed to Delphi's request, it would sanction a strike. A judge is expected to rule by June.
So what would happen if GM sought to cut its pension benefits by, say, 20% to 40%?
"I might as well shoot myself," said 65-year-old Linda Ruth Jones, who retired in 1996 after 34 years as a GM assembly worker and inspector at plants in Flint and Pontiac, Mich.
Jones retired to the rural community of Harrison, Mich., about 300 miles north of Detroit. If her GM pension was cut by even 20%, Jones said, she couldn't continue making her $350 monthly mortgage payment.
Recently, Jones protested a GM-union agreement made last fall to begin imposing extra costs on retirees for health insurance. She says that the automaker is breaking a promise that kept her working hard for more than three decades.
"I didn't go to work at GM for the wages," she said. "I went for benefits for my two children, whose father wouldn't support them, and for myself when I retired. I paid a baby-sitter every day so I could work for GM."
In return, she said, the company promised a certain level of benefits "and now they are forcing things on us that we shouldn't have to face at this time of our life. They signed a contract with us at retirement, and they should be made to stand by that contract."
For the auto workers union, GM's financial woes are forcing bitter choices: how to apportion financial pain among former workers who draw healthcare and pension benefits and the workers currently on the shop floor.
Paul Krell, a spokesman for the union in Detroit, said its goal in reducing pay and benefits "is to spread the sacrifices as broadly but as thinly as possible."
The issue of legacy costs "creates a real conflict between existing workers and retired workers," said Jeff Werbalowsky, a reorganization specialist and co-chief executive of financial advisory firm Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin in Los Angeles.
That conflict could deepen in bankruptcy, because under Chapter 11 the automaker could try to dump its $95-billion pension plans onto the federal Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. If the Bankruptcy Court agreed, many GM workers could face sharply reduced benefits, because the federal agency is limited in what it can pay.
Even if GM didn't seek to hand its pension funds to the agency, many analysts say the company undoubtedly would use that threat as a key bargaining chip to wring other cost savings from the union.
Moreover, the auto workers union faces the likelihood that whatever deals it strikes with GM, they would be models for the rest of the auto industry.
"We expect that any concessions that GM got out of the UAW, Ford and Chrysler would expect to get as well," said Mark Oline, head of corporate debt at credit-rating firm Fitch Ratings in Chicago.
The implications of a new round of labor cost cutting in the auto industry, however, could go far beyond that business.
What is happening at GM, many analysts say, is a microcosm of the rest of the country. The question it poses: In the age of globalization, can U.S. companies, state and local governments and the Social Security system really afford the healthcare and retirement benefits they have promised their workers?
Politically, that issue has been too hot to touch.
In bankruptcy, however, some obligations ultimately go unpaid.
"The one thing that a bankruptcy makes clear is that, this is the size of the pie, and that's all there is," Werbalowsky said.
Largest U.S. bankruptcies
With $160 billion in assets in its automotive operations, General
Motors would rank as the largest U.S. bankruptcy in history if the company filed for reorganization - a move that GM says it is not contemplating.
Largest U.S. bankruptcies, ranked by pre-bankruptcy assets (in billions)
Company Year filed Assets 1. WorldCom 2002 $103.9 2. Enron 2001 $63.4 3. Conseco 2002 $61.4 4. Texaco 1987 $35.9 5. Financial Corp. of America 1988 $33.9 6. Global Crossing 2002 $30.2 7. Pacific Gas & Electric 2001 $29.8 8. Calpine 2005 $26.6 9. UAL (United Air Lines) 2002 $25.2 10. Delta Air Lines 2005 $21.8 11. Adelphia Communications 2002 $21.5 12. MCorp (Texas bank) 1989 $20.2 13. Mirant 2003 $19.4 14. Delphi 2005 $17.1 15. First Executive 1991 $15.2
Source: New Generation Research
Skidding marks
For decades GM has lost sales to Asian and European automakers. Here's a look at the company's shrinking slice of the U.S. market over the past four decades.
Share of U.S. auto sales
General Motors: 50%
Ford: 26%
Chrysler: 14%
Total imports: 5%
Other American: 4%
General Motors: 41%
Total imports: 24%
Ford: 21%
Chrysler: 12%
Other American: 2%
Total imports: 43%
General Motors: 26%
Ford: 17%
Chrysler: 14%
-- your best, last and only line of defense-a Cohort of Roman Heavy Infantry
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
Add image file
Bankruptcy is not a death knell to big companies. If performed sooner, then bankruptcy rescues companies from their only problem - defective top management. People with finance backgrounds who then stifle innovation - and lie about it. If bankruptcy was so destructive, then why does that article ignore 1991 when GM was about 4 hours away from bankruptcy? When GM only used bean counter tricks as a temporary patch rather then eliminate bean counter management. The lessons from 1979 Chrysler and 1981 Ford are that bankruptcy can eliminate a company's number one problem - top management. But consumers must stop buying their defective products so that cash flow games do not protect those top managers.
Chrysler replaced bean counters with Iacocca - a car guy. Therefore car guys - not finance people - began fixing bad Chrysler models. A solution that created record profits in only four years. The only reason for Chrysler's brush with bankruptcy was top management who all came from business schools AND had neither product experience nor knowledge.
Same solution saved Ford Motor when its only problem - Henry Ford - was removed. Car guys designed the 1965 Mustang. Car guys never designed another Ford product for 22 years - Ford Taurus. Profits in 1990 were directly traceable to work performed by car guys in 1981 through 1987. But first, bean counter management must be removed.
Ask why Louis Hughes (who earned profits in his group) was not promoted to chairman. Why did they promote Rick Wagoner - whose North American operations were losing money? Because Wagoner was a classic bean counter - not a car guy. Why put a bean counter in charge? That is GM's only problem. Bean counters, since Roger Smith 30 years ago, design GM products. Therefore GM product require two extra cylinders to only be equal to competition products. Government can give GM hundreds of millions of dollars 12 years ago to build a hybrid - and GM still does not have one? Explains why GM cars cost so much to build. Why GM products require more parts, are more complex to construct, use so much obsolete technologies, why engine tolerances are lower, and why GM management must then blame unions, tax structure, laws, and foreign competition. They are bean counters. Why would they blame the only problem - themselves?
Only bankruptcy would eliminate such problems.
When an employee works, the company puts pension and health care money into a fund. When that employee retires, that retirement account is fully funded. So why did GM not fund their retirement accounts? To make profits look higher? So now these same bean counters want to blame retiree expenses? They know you will not bother to ask embarrassing questions - why those pensions funds were missing $billions? Bean counters were claiming profits in the 1990s that would not exist if those retiree benefit funds were being funded.. Bean counters all but lying so that you might blame others.
First thing that must be eliminated from GM - Rick Wagoner - who was not even making profits in his North American operation - and his subordinates. The sooner GM confronts bankruptcy, then the sooner GM will stop failing. Threat of bankruptcy - Akers at IBM, Allen of AT&T, Spindler at Apple, etc - was necessary to remove those only problems: MBAs - finance oriented management. If not done quickly, then that management will harm employees, blame government laws - and you and me - for their problems. GM has one problem - Rick Wagoner and his subordinates - graduates of business and law schools. Why do so many engineers recommend their kids not be engineers? GM is a classic example. Only bean counter types get promoted - control designs. In such organizations, innovation and innovators are only expenses on spread sheets.
Sooner a threat of bankruptcy, then the sooner GM employees will still have jobs. Bean counter management can only play spread sheet games to lie about the only reason for their problems: top management that does not have dirt under their fingernails and who could not recognize an innovation if it were stuffed up their nose..
Jim Higgins wrote:

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
Add image file
And to think that several dealers took out large ads praising Rick Wagoner as the greatest GM "leader" since Alfred P. Sloan. Wagoner is only delaying the root canal.

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
Add image file
If GM goes under their will be a depression in the US. Americans better soon wise up and support their own economy or millions more American workers will lose their jobs. Americans should be more like the Japanese consumers. They do not buy anything for foreign company that they can buy from Japanese corporations to protect their own economy. Soon them only skill you children we need is how to say."Do you want fries with that?" or "Welcome to WalMart" ;)
mike hunt

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
Add image file

They might not be able to avoid bankruptcy, but it wouldn't necessarily be a disaster..
For the nation, nothing is likely to happen, ...
For the workers, they will lose their union jobs, benefits, etc. They might be rehired under the reformed company, under different conditions.
For the stockholders, they may well lose their investments.
GM would likely reorganize under bankruptcy protection, and just keep on trucking.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
Add image file
Chrysler. Remember that although Lee Iacocca reworked Chrysler, it was the government bailout under Carter that provided the immediate cash and prevented bankruptcy. In G.M.'s case I suspect the following will happend: 1) general downsizing; 2) downsizing of union pension benefits, 3)eventual foreign production of most G.M. models (e.g. China, Korea), 4) import of foreign "kit" cars (G.M. did this with the '88 Nova from Toyota, assembled in the U.S., to avoid tariffs). I can imagine G.M. as a wholy foreign company importing foreign built cars into the U.S. for assembly, marketing and distribution. G.M. started their downslide in '70 with the "Vega" and its pseudo-technology. G.M. is far more successful as a marketing company than as an engineering model.

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
Add image file
Based upon the Georgia area GM (Chevrolet) Rep's handling of non breakdown warranty claims, GM is not going to survive. In times like these, GM should be bending over backwards to keep long term customers. (Family history of GM cars to before GM bought Oldsmobile, ~97 years). Instead, I'm in the middle of a hassle concerning an 05 Impala that does not conform to the federal Lemon Law. At this point GM can either replace the Impala, or loose not only myself as a customer, but all of my present and future descendants, my friends, and anyone that will listen to the details concerning my problem with the Impala.

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
Add image file

Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.