Hi everyone. I have gotten some conflicting information concerning exhaust back pressure. Some say reduce it as much as possible, you don't need that back pressure for anything. It's a myth. Others say if you get rid of too much you will burn your valves out unless you do some kind of adjustment to the valves.
So... can you replace those manifolds with long tube headers and just leave the valves alone or not?
Well, years ago, Hot Rod magazine did a dyno test of various exhaust set-ups using only one vehicle and discovered that some back pressure is actually beneficial. This may vary from engine to engine but I've heard many people say that total elimination of back pressure actually hurt engine performance.
Hi everyone. I have gotten some conflicting information concerning exhaust back pressure. Some say reduce it as much as possible, you don't need that back pressure for anything. It's a myth. Others say if you get rid of too much you will burn your valves out unless you do some kind of adjustment to the valves. So... can you replace those manifolds with long tube headers and just leave the valves alone or not?
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% "So why do I drive a big SUV? It's because I have to haul numerous people and things to places." ~ R. Lee Baxton ~
I think it is indeed up in the air, but I would like to see dynamometer data on it.
The Goodheart Wilcox Automotive Encyclopedia has graphs that show that at 60 miles per hour, the effect is as follows Loss of horsepower Backpressure at muffler
2% 2 psi
4.5% 4 psi
7% 6 psi
10% 8 psi
13% 10 psi
They also publish a fuel consumption chart, at 75 mph.
Understood. Less back pressure is good for performance. Fuel economy, torque and HP benefit. Of that there is no doubt. What is in question is, do valves or other things need to be adjusted or modified to prevent damage if back pressure is reduced passed a certain threshold?
No valve adjustment needed. The damage is supposed to be caused by the engine running lean. A lean air/fuel mixture causes an increase in heat. This increase in heat is claimed to burn the exhuast valves. Don't know if this is possible in the real world.
If you have a complete exhaust system, catalytic converter, crossover pipe, muffler, and tailpipe; there will be a certain amount of backpressure period. You never clarified that.
Even a simple exhaust with a crossover and 3" muffler pipe will create some backpressure. In this case, you want some mild backpressure. This creates a resonation that aids exhaust flow. This is needed when the intake and exhaust valves are open, however minutely, at the same time. The intake valve opening gases cool the exhaust valve slightly. With no exhaust resonance, the exhaust gases don't lend to cooling from the intake.
If you're running just straight header, you may check out using a high temp tolerant exhaust valve.
Wrong. For maximum performance you don't want any back pressure. Back pressure equals restricton. You want a free flowing exhaust for performance.
This creates
Wrong. The diameter and length of the exhaust pipe aid exhaust flow not back pressure.
This is needed when the intake and
Wrong again. The fuel mixture determines how hot the valves will get. A rich fuel mixture burns cooler compared to a lean mixture. A richer air/fuel mixture makes more power. Valve overlap ( when the intake and exhaust valves are open, however minutely, at the same time ) relies on a properly tuned intake and (unrestricted) tuned exhaust to remove all the exhaust gases from the cylinder AND completely fill the cylinder with a fresh air/fuel mixture. The more exhaust you can remove from the cylinder the more room you have for a fresh air/fuel mixture. The more fuel you can cram into the cylinder the more power you can make. Most of the exhaust valve cooling occurs when the valve is closed. The exhaust valve transfers heat to the valve when closed, which colls the exhaust valve. This is why you don't want too narrow valve seat on the exhaust side.
Probably not need on an engine designed for unleaded fuel unless used for long periods of wide open throttle, such as nascar.
Back pressure is bad all the time. Back pressure equals restriction. You ALWAYS want a free flowing exhaust. You use exhaust pipe length and diameter to tune an exhaust NOT backpressure.
*********Technically correct
*********Technically incorrect. Old wives tale.
*********A resonant condition can aid exhaust flow, just like a resonant stack on the intake can improve the induction. But it is not a function of backpressure. Consider the stack or the exhaust to be like an trombone...at a certain length, it becomes resonant to sound waves. An engine has pulses, due to the pistons pulling in air and pushing out exhaust, which have a frequency component and are in fact sound waves. Tune the intake and exhaust and you can improve the throughput.
Some racers used to put extensions on their headers and run the engine at specified RPM for a few minutes. You can, more or less, accurately tell where to cut the extension off, due to the heat discoloration point at that RPM:
To answer your question, no, the valves won't need adjusting. To answer the questions you didn't ask:
Yes, you will likely need to re-jet to allow for a richer mixture. Yes, you may need to alter your air intake system to allow for more air flow. No, you shouldn't run headers only. Yes, if you run headers and pipes all the way back, you'll need an X pipe or H pipe behind the headers for maximum flow. After these changes, you may want to check your plugs occasionally to see how they look.
Thank you Dave. I think I will go with a cat back setup to avoid any engine issues and any EPA type issues. I do appreciate everyone's comments and suggestions. Hopefully they are helpful to others as well.
It goes a bit farther than "some back pressure". Has to due with exhaust tuning so that the exhaust pressure pulse wave is used to reduce back pressure under some conditions, and increase it for others. Sound damping, vibration damping, and fuel usage are considerations, along with power.
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.