Honda cars less dependable than Toyotas?

I know some Fords are supposedly scoring high in reliability, almost on par with Toyota and Honda. But these models (e.g. Fusion) haven't been around long enough to judge true long-term reliability. Wait a few more years and let's see how they hold up then.

I had the last model of 280Z before they switched to the 280ZX. I never had a problem with the thermotime switch, though on both my 1976 and

Pat

Ford is more popular in Europe than in US.

I put Koni's on mine -- sure improved the handling. I can see why on U joints given the IRS system used which was quite different from the ZX.

On Mar 24, 3:21=A0pm, "Cameo" wrote: snip

I bought a 2010 Sienna several months ago and one of the factors was road noise at highway speeds. IMHO, Sienna is limo-like whereas Odyssey is noisy and rougher riding. That's a poor trade-off for marginally better handling in my book. (My Sienna came with simply awful tires. I'll probably put on a set of Michelin HydroEdge tires; that should improve handling a bit.)

I'd buy any Honda sight unseen. But they do tend to have a lot of road noise. Now that I'm almost deaf anyway, doesn't make much difference.

Wifey has the new 2009 CRV and loves it. Great price and appointments compared to the competitors.

I bought a 2010 Sienna several months ago and one of the factors was road noise at highway speeds. IMHO, Sienna is limo-like whereas Odyssey is noisy and rougher riding. That's a poor trade-off for marginally better handling in my book. (My Sienna came with simply awful tires. I'll probably put on a set of Michelin HydroEdge tires; that should improve handling a bit.)

How does a person like you or me determine something like this?

Huh? What model Honda (ans/or Acura)? I owned an 88' Acura Integra sedan and own an '03 Accord sedan. Have done oil changes on both from the get go (inc. oil filters), also change brake pads, cabin & air filters, etc. Getting harder for me since I'm 68 and have Parkinson's Disease, but I allow longer.

On 3/26/2010 5:39 AM Tony Harding spake these words of knowledge:

I'm not sure I understand the question. He was talking about his own personal experience. You're asking how you make evaluations of your personal experience. If you don't know that, you've got much more serious problems than what car to drive.

RFT!!! Dave Kelsen

On 3/26/2010 5:45 AM Tony Harding spake these words of knowledge:

I agree. I have an 03 sedan and an 04 coupe. No problem changing the oil, and I'm a very large person, although only in my 50's.

RFT!!! Dave Kelsen

'94 Accord.

Is your Accord 4 or 6 cylinder? My 1995 accord with a 4 cylinder is not easy at all on replacing the oil filter, but I have managed it twice.

By comparison, the filter on the 1994 Camry is on the front of the engine with space all around it. That is the easiest car oil filter I have accessed during my lifetime.

Four cylinders, and the oil filter is sqeezed in the back at the firewall. I think it can only be accessed from below.

I've found a more detailed report on that survey and that indicates long term reliability, after 3 years of ownership. Here is the link:

How does one decide on the "safest" car ever, the driver is such a

Thanks, Dave, big guy here, too, ... that's why God made hydraulic jacks which lift the car well off the ground. Also why I pull the R/F wheel to change the oil & filter - more room. After some experience I change the oil filter from a sitting position.

:)

Is that noticeably different? I have no experience with the 199x models.

On 3/27/2010 6:20 AM Tony Harding spake these words of knowledge:

Tony Harding wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@news5.newsguy.com: