2002 Sonata acquisition question

My boss is looking to purchase a new car for his wife. The dealer is offering him $3500 trade-in for her old car. He is offering it to me for the same price.

The vehicle is a 2002 Hyundai Sonata LX, 6 cyl blk/blk with 102K (mostly daily highway commute).

Body: Pretty good, no rust through and only two blistered areas by rear wheel wells. Front fender was replaced when she hit a raccoon. Small scrape on rear bumper.

Interior: quite nice, just minor wear as expected.

Maintenance: Some dealer, some indy, all records.

Tires are fairly new Hankooks.

Now, the questions.... there is a high-pitched noise when the brakes are applied. Seems to come from the right rear. I don't hear it when the parking brake is applied. I don't think the car has ABS. Any nasty surprises possible here? I can replace the rotors and pads myself, unless there is some factor I don't know...about $100 and a day's work?

Two, the "check engine" light is on. He says he's been told it's a code for the "fuel sensor". Something in the fuel tank. It's currently past due for inspection. Will I have a problem with NYS inspection since the light is on? I'm willing to buy an OBC-II scan tool, or whatever, to turn the light off/ identify the problem. Any thoughts?

My last car was an '85 Camry, my current car is a '92 Sentra. I just finished putting in exhaust, right control arm, rotors and pads in the Sentra and am able to do most repairs myself if I know what to replace. By my standards, the Sonata is positively luxurious and I don't mind putting some work into it. However, I don't want to play "replace $1000 worth of sensors trying to make the light go off". I am not familiar with Hyundai so I would welcome any advice as to this car's quirks.

PB

Reply to
Plague Boy
Loading thread data ...

No surprises with the brakes. Just another car with disk brakes.

Yup - you're going to fix that before NY will pass it for inspection. All vehicles past 1994 are subject to the requirement that a Check Engine light is an automatic failure. You can't just get it reset either. The computer will look at the cycles in the on board vehicle computer and if it has not cycled enough times since the last CEL was cleared, it fails.

The good news is that the evap canister repairs on these is pretty straight up. You shouldn't have to pour a ton of money into this to clear the CEL issue.

Reply to
Mike Marlow

Pretty much agree with Mike here. Depending on the trouble code, significant diagnosis may be required to find the cause of the check engine lamp.

-- Message posted using

formatting link
information at
formatting link

Reply to
hyundaitech

Thanks to you and Mike for your replies. I've taken the plunge and bought the car, although I do not have it yet.

I'm still thinking of buying a scan tool. JC Whitney lists them from $40 to $500. The sub-$100 ones look pretty iffy. The $500 model I could hook to my laptop definitely calls my inner geek, but might be overkill. I could probably use a scan tool on an occasional basis, and if it saved me a trip to the dealer it would probably be near a break-even investment. Any models or brands to look for/avoid?

PB

Reply to
Plague Boy

I don't have much experience with aftermarket scan tools, so I don't have much advice.

If this is going to be a long-term investment, you should purchase a CAN compataible scan tool. In the next few years, all vehicles will need to use that communciations protocol, and not all scan tools are compatible with it.

If you're looking for something basic, all you need is one that will read codes and tell you what they mean (usually in a book). The next step up to be considered would be something that actually reports data, but this is a typically a larger expense than a do-it-yourselfer can justify.

There are a few posters here who have experience with some of the tools. Perhaps they'll share.

-- Message posted using

formatting link
information at
formatting link

Reply to
hyundaitech

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.