It seems like every year someone posts a message asking about how to make their 2WD car make it through the snows of winter, how much snow tires help, and the discussion veers to the supposed benefits of AWD vs. 2WD (front or rear) in such conditions. (Somebody trying to justify their purchase of an SUV, maybe.)
Anyway, so here comes the March 2006 issue of Road & Track, page 71. R&T has done testing of summer tire, all-season tire, and snow tire equipped cars in summer/winter conditions. There opinion is credible. Here is what they say as part of a comparison test of mid-size all-wheel drive sedans:
"Which is better, one of our AWD competitors on all-season tires, or its front- or rear-drive counterparts on dedicated summer or winter rubber? Summer is a close call; but winter isn't. All-wheel drive has its benefits, but not the 28-30 percent offered by dedicated snow tires. And AWD won't help at all when it comes to stopping in snow. Of course, the best choice for winter conditions is all-wheel drive and snow tires."
The 28-30% figure comes from comparison testing of all-season and winter tires on snow - snows are 28-30% better.
I come away pleased from this as it confirms my experience in driving a 2000 Yukon XL AWD with all-seasons and now a '92 LS400 on winter rubber through Michigan winters. I felt the LS was doing every bit as well and even thought it might be doing a wee bit better in all but very deep (say, 10") snow, but the latter seemed counter-intuitive.
Just wanted to make sure this gets into the Google memory banks in time for next winter.
- GRL