Hi everybody, here's one to debate a little.
I have a 2000 Forester with 182K miles+ and soon need to replace the
Goodyear Triple Treds I've been using.
Would I be better off running something like Blizzaks year round and
replacing them often, or would it be wiser to maintain two sets of tires:
summer, and winter?
It seems to me, that I would be just as far ahead to just frequently buy new
Blizzaks or equivalent.
TIA for comments.
You do NOT want to run Blizzaks year round unless you want to buy at
leat one set of tires a year.After one summer of driving they will be
totally useless as a winter tire - and at their best they are pretty
useless as a summer tire. All wrong tread and compound.
The ONLY sensible thing to do is either run all-seasons rear round and
be running a compromise virtually all year, or have 2 sets of rims,
with dedicated ice/snow tires for the winter and touring or rain tires
for the rest of the year - depending on where you live (assuming you
DO need snow tires)
A Forester with GOOD all season tires will get around better than a 2
wheel drive car with dedicated seasonal tires.
No personal experience, but the Nokian WR or WRG2 are highly rated -
and if they are anything like Nokian's Hakkapeliita Snows, you won't
be disappointed. The WR and WRG2 are rated as "adequate" in snow, and
very good in both wet and dry. The Assurance TripleTread gets a good
I'm running Goodyear Eagles on my PT Cruiser as my 3 season tires,
with Dunlop Graspics for the winter - and the Eagles are by far the
best tire I've ever owned for wet traction and dry traction on hot
pavement. They grip like they have claws. FAR better than the Tiger
Paw Touring tires I threw away with 75% tread left. Those things felt
like I was on ball bearings any time I touched the accellerator or
brakes - and it's NOT a Turbo!!! Looking at the tread, I'll bet
they'd be pretty reasonable in slop as well - but not likely terribly
good in deep dry-ish snow. The Graspics have been GREAT - on
Daughter's Neon, Wife's Mistyque, my TransSport, My PT Cruiser, and
Daughter's new Honda.
Had Blizzaks on Daughter's Colt 200 and they compare very favourably -
with the Graspics retaining the edge after 2 or more seasons.
On Aug 20, 4:26 am, email@example.com wrote:
Nokian thoughtfully omitted Hakkapeliita from the WR and WRG2 model
I bet they are highly rated by people who have snowless winter.
there are a lot of eagle models in goodyear lineup: and they are
hardly all the same
It still amazes me that people jump to conclusion on traction
looking at the tread pattern in this day and age of highly specialized
tire compounds (and winter slicks)
Loss leader tire manufacturers are preying on this feature of the tire
buying populace like there is no tomorrow.
I assure you even bald tires grip very differently even in mud let
on ice and snow depending on the tire model (tire compound used).
The is CURRERNTLY only ONE Eagle GT (did I omit the GT in the last
post? I'm sure I specified it in my first post) - and it is better
than the perevious Eagle GT and Eagle GT1 tires.
There is a LOT you can tell looking at a tread - like can it clear
itself or will it pack full - that you learn from years in the
business. Traction on wet surfaces and ice are harder to tell bey
looking - unless you look REAL close at the micro-sipes etc.
Except when bald, there is no tread compound left.
On Aug 22, 10:48 pm, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
Ok, I'll have to inject more specifics.
I have Nokian Hakka i3 175 70 13 tire mounted on my rear wheel driver
(mono wheel driver, no LSD)
(i3 is a summer ultra high performance tire, not sold in the united
I have Continental ContiProContact in 235 45 17 on my torsen center
diff equipped four ringed A4
It takes a while to get Hakka i3 lose traction. I had my rwd beater
nearly lying on the rear axle in
a rut full of water with clay at the bottom, It takes no effort to get
A4 stuck with contiprocontact
on level wet grass covered clay field.
ContiProContact tire has marginally more agressive treat pattern. It
does not good in
my softroading sesstion despite awdf (torsen) helping.
Now neither i3 nor contiprocontact are meant for any offroad stints.
But i3 somehow does it better
and i attribute that to the compound that grips MUCH better in wet.
Alphalt or not.
This is all subjective of course. ContiProContact is the highway all
season tire and all it's good for is to wear
slowly unless you subject it to scorching heat of a sunbelt summer, i
guess it's not fair to compare
it to UHP tire. But given offroading context and your claim of tread
importance I had to give
it a shot.
I do not own a high speed camera and glass covered test facility to
record the tire
performance. I could not care less how the tread pattern looks like.
It ain't the 70s anymore.
It's important only to the engineers who design the tire and marketers
who prep the ground for the salesfolk,.
tell that to the lucky few who tried winter slicks
Tires DESIGNED to have no tread and "bald" tires that used to have
tread are different things, totally - and a "winter slick" might be
fantastic on ice, but would be totally useless in loose or wet snow.
On Aug 23, 7:43 pm, email@example.com wrote:
My point is that max and extreme(semislick) performance (and even UHPs
such as i3, about 3-4 mil of tread left) age more
gracefully than highway all seasons retaining more traction at their
end of life
than highway all seasons had when new and broken in (ContiProContact,
about 7 mil of tread left)
I haven't driven winter slicks in snow but I somehow have a feeling
the usefullness would
heavily depend on the driveline setup with all 4 wheels driven on sti
making the setup not so useless.
now on to the subject why the women in southern urop look like crap in
their late 30s/early 40s
while the age of consent is not dissimilar from that in other parts of
the world shortening their
useful "track" life :^)
invoking freud with his, of course false, theories :)
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.