I was wondering if most ECUs can recognise an engine going backwards, and not attempt to fuel it?
For example, if stalled going up a hill, and allowed to roll backwards fast enough to reach its operating RPM, or slammed into reverse to stop the car after a total brake failure.
You can't run a four stroke engine backwards. It would compress gasses drawn from the exhaust system and push whatever back out of the inlet manifold. One with red hot sparking plugs etc might just manage a couple of revolutions.
Some two strokes can be easily reversed by altering the ignition timing. This used to be the way with some bubble cars.
If you are thinking of the later Bond 3-wheeler, it just started in reverse; no alteration to the ignition timing was made. It was in such a low state of tune that the ignition advance would have been minimal.
Electric starting was provided by a combined starter/generator called a Siba Dynastart. To reverse entailed switching off, operating an electrical switch, then restarting. All gears could then be used to go backwards!
At around the same era I owned a 125cc BSA Bantam. With the folly of youth, I tuned it, raising its 5bhp to something possibly approaching 6! These revisions meant that it would sometimes backfire on starting, and run backwards. This was something of a surprise the first time it happened; I used it to good effect later to shock/amuse passers-by :-)
So the old addage of people being found dead in a bubble car, in a garage, because they drove in too far up against the end wall is a urban legend? :o)
One of my schoolmates' dad had one, and someone pushed him up to a wall in his bubble car for a giggle. He just opened the front to push on the wall and it moved backwards and he was out. Anybody who couldn't work it out didn't deserve to get out.
I once saw a Yamaha 125 single sorta try to stall with a cough while stationary at traffic lights but it didn't actually stop running and picked up rpm again. Lights went green, rider seclected 1st, released clutch and moved off backwards.
-- Peter Hill Spamtrap reply domain as per NNTP-Posting-Host in header Can of worms - what every fisherman wants. Can of worms - what every PC owner gets!
On a conventionally fuelled petrol (ie not a direct injection), they can't run backwards. When you reverse a four stroke, the inlet becomes the exhaust, and the exhaust becomes the inlet, so unless the petrol can defy laws of physics and get into the combustion chambers, it won't run.
Off course, common rail diesels and direct injections could possibly just about manage it, but the timing would be that far of, they probably wouldn't.
As for pre-common rail diesels, the basic pump designs won't pump at enough pressure for injection to occur when spun backwards, plus timing will be quite a bit out.
As to weather the ECU would detect this, it would probably detect a cam/crank sensor out of phase fault, leading to the engine management operating a reduced power mode, but the engine itself is more likely to stall before the ECU does anything about it.
Yep, the hydraulic pump used to supply enough back pressure to kick them a long way back if they didn't fire. Sounded lumpy as hell but apparently that didn't stop people putting them into drive & wondering what the hell was going on.
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.