It's my idiot filter. If they're too lazy to edit, I can be to lazy to read their comment.
Jeff
It's my idiot filter. If they're too lazy to edit, I can be to lazy to read their comment.
Jeff
What do you expect from draft dodgers..
See how much better it reads from the bottom up?
suggests that most pe>>> Umm .... anyone here ever heard of snipping an article like above?. >>
I was in college during most of the Viet Nam era where almost all the hams were into some form of engineering. Many got drafted. At a later class reunion, I asked if they had worked in electronics, communications, computahs, or something technical. Nope. Mostly ground pounder and nobody ended up in communications. I would have assumed that being almost a college grad, would qualify them for something better, but apparently not. My guess(tm) is that for only 2 years of service, the Army was not going to invest in tech training.
It required a six years commitment for active duty. That was usually three years in tech school, a month and a half for basic and the rest working in the field you trained for.
Only in rare cases did they push their luck and have someone test out of a long school.
Then take a sledge hammer to the piece of junk.
No insult; fact.
IIRC, Mike Lupika was already a sports writer for the NY Post when he was on IitM. He went up from there, but hardly an unknown in the NY area. I always thought Charles McCord was the brains in the outfit. Imus was too stoned. I remember the time he, on a break, went into the janitor's closet, thinking it was the men's room. He was so blotto never knew any better. McCord had to go find him. I think that's when he got the "opportunity" in Cleveland.
The FCC is one thing, but you don't want to mess with the Janitor's union!
Not being a big follower of sports, I didn't think of him as well known at all. Imus used to tease him about being somewhat short. He was very likable and interesting.
Really? You were there? LOL!
In message , Michael A. Terrell writes
Do you think that they made a short-sighted decision then ?
Don't forget the jet engine
In message , Michael A. Terrell writes
All by yourself, big boi ?
or was that just the solder joints ?
In message , snipped-for-privacy@snyder.on.ca writes
You could say more or less the same comparing a ford fiesta and a rolls royce
In message , Michael A. Terrell writes
Because falling out of the sky and killing people is not a vote winner
In message , Michael A. Terrell writes
Do you even know who Sir Frank Whittle was ?
(without sneaking off and looking it up in google, of course)
In message , tm writes
'60 Enfield that DOESN'T leak
What, you didn't put any oil in it? :)
tm
--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: snipped-for-privacy@netfront.net ---
I think you'll find that a Rolls will move more passenger-miles per hour than a Ford Fiesta. ;-)
A fully-loaded city bus and the RR would be a more meaningful comparision/analogy.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required