I have a '95 xantia 2.0i vsx auto hatchback. I am experiencing very hard suspension at the rear, especially when I go over speed bumps. It is also very hard when the boot is heavily loaded or when I carry passengers. I've had quite severe tyre wear on the front and a blow out on the rear while carrying passengers. Does anyone know what is wrong? Do I need to replace all spheres or is my rear height sensor that is faulty? Also, how many spheres are there on a 95 vsx model?
any advice greatly appreciated.
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
A
Adrian
( snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :
Very probably, yes. When were they last done? When was the LHM last changed?
If it's sitting at normal ride height correctly, then no.
A VSX has Hydractive, so there's the four wheel spheres, one centre sphere each end, the main accumulator and the rear anti-sink sphere.
B
bermudez007
Adrain The spheres have never been touched from new. The LHM has been changed recently. Which sphere should I replace or should I just do all the rear ones? The rear anti sink sphere sound promising.
I thought the suspension is suposed to go extra bouncy if its faulty, not rock hard?
Adrian wrote:
A
Adrian
( snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :
On an 11yo car? They're about 8 years overdue for replacement...
ALL OF THEM! ESPECIALLY THE ACCUMULATOR...
OK, the accumulator acts in a similar way to the battery in your electrics. If that sphere is flat, then you have :-
No reserve of pressure if the engine cuts whilst you're on the road - which means NO BRAKES. AT ALL. It's not like a normal car where you just lose the servo. You Will Have No Brakes At All.
Nothing to dampen the pressure pulses from the pump - which can crack the regulator housing.
A pump which is working FAR harder than it needs to. And which will fail sooner.
And - just to add another reason... If the front spheres are flat, then the rubber strut tops are working FAR harder than they need to - because, apart from the tyre sidewalls, they're all that's giving you any suspension. If they let go - AND THEY DO - especially on a car that's been run with flat spheres - you may well find your front struts doing this :-
formatting link
(Yes, that's an XM not a Xant - they both do it)
That's the *least* important to change. Do 'em ALL. Seriously. They're not expensive - £20 each or so. You will not believe the difference.
When the spheres are flat, you have NO suspension other than the tyre sidewalls. The bouncing is *because* it's rock hard and just bobbling from bump to bump.
J
James
Adrain
I've noticed that the rear brake pads have little wear, even after 2/3 years of use. I guess this is all related to the sphere pressure. The car does take a while to pump up in the morning, but this has always been the case since I bought the car in 2000. The car has never really braked well without the engine runing.
thanks for the advice.
Adrian wrote:
A
Adrian
James ( snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :
No, it's just that hydraulic Cits really don't use their back brakes very much, unless you have a weight in the boot.
The normal problem's that the pads stick and the brakes don't do anything at MOT.
With the anti-sink, it shouldn't sink at all overnight.
It should have enough pressure reserve for two or three stops from speed...
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.