The Rover Factory Now

formatting link

Found this on a Mini website, very sad.

Taffy

Reply to
Taffy
Loading thread data ...

No it doesn't work oh well try this then?

formatting link
Taffy

Reply to
Taffy

What an absolute shame, Taff, and the ironical thing is, towards the end,, the rover factory was producing a very nice range of cars, better than it has done for years, Fitzy

Reply to
Fitzy

They were nice cars, but they were at least 2 generations behind competition. Biggest seller was the 200/25 that was 10 years old, when the shelf life of a car is usually no longer than 5 years. The last model (except for a couple of niche models or restylings) was the 75 and dated back to 1999, 5 years! Most brands launch a major model at least every year. Let's not even mention the 45 that was already an old design when it came out 10 years ago.

In a day when all car manufacturers have a complete range of 7 to 10 models, including minivan derivatives, coupés and SUVs, there was no way MG Rover could compete with just the 25, 45 and 75 and no new models in the pipe. Good cars, but antiquated when compared to the competition.

Reply to
Nicholas Bales

Well BMW's involvement didn't help and pulling production of the BINI was the deathknell, but still it gives us even more of a reason to hate the BINI.

Taffy

Reply to
Taffy

Of course, cutting off the only models that had received an investment and had a chance of being profitable (Land Rover and Mini) should never have been accepted by the people in charge. Without those profits there was no way Rover could invest in R&D.

I forgot the only new model that was introduced was the CityRover, and that wasn't even a PR disaster, it was non-existant! They had been selling them for one year and there was NO advertisement, NO exporting, NO publicity! Stealth marketing!

Reply to
Nicholas Bales

Buick V8. They didn't think it was good enough so sold it to Rover/BMC :-)

Reply to
Howard Rose

How right they were too, that lump of pig iron went on to do nothing else ..... not ! ;-)

PS - Fitzy, there are photo's of my old mini's, but they be photo's; and me have no scanner !

The restoration is being fully photographed and will be web'ised in glorious technocolour at some point in the future(ish).

Reply to
Biffa Bacón

Look forward to viewing them, ;-) Fitzy

Reply to
Fitzy

Turned out to be a brilliant engine if I recall, even as a transplant replacement for the troublesome V8 Triumph Stag, Fitzy

Reply to
Fitzy

Am I being stupid or isnt that he same engine? Not being funny or sarcy but I thought that Triumph used the same V8s as Rover? Im only saying this coz I remember a few years ago my mate bought a TR8 (TR7-V8) and it was exactly the same block and heads as the Rover unit. (alloy)

Reply to
MiNiFrEeK :)

You could be right, I was told by a old mechanic who worked for a Triumph dealership years ago, that the Rover engine was better than the Triumph, something to do with the heads or the head gaskets, ?? Fitzy

Reply to
Fitzy

did a search and found these

formatting link
write-ups appear suggest they where different V8 enginesFitzy

Reply to
Fitzy

totally different engines, loads of people put rover engines in triumphs because the triumph engine was extremely unreliable,

Steve.

Reply to
Steve68s

Thanks for clearing that one up Steve, Fitzy

Reply to
Fitzy

The triumph has the overhead cam where as the Rover does not.

The triumph is much like the SAAB and the V8 Triumph is another 4 cylinders attached. I think that SAAB and Triumph did have a connection where Triumph were supplying motors or castings to them.

The Rover V8 is a nice motor but having some problems in the short cuts implemented into the motor. (the timing chain is the only thing keeps the cam in place hence wear lets the cam float) etc.

Performance wise the Triumph was better. There were heaps of head gasket problems, Head studs had to be removed to remove the head. These were often seized in the head and were cut off to remove the head. The head studs (middle) were at an angle so had to be removed to remove the head.

Yes Triumphs still have a couple - sigh!

Reply to
Rob

You could hardly call the CityRover "a Rover product" when the bonnet and boot badges were about all that Rover manufactured for it!

Reply to
mwalsh

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.