New GT500 Clicks Off 12.70s @ 116 mph

Jun 14, 2006 28 Replies

My opinion; Inexperience, coupled with a fear of flooring the accelerator.

I've seen some pretty poor 60' times at the track from the new GTs, but never seen a crappier ET or trap speed. Maybe there was a kitten jammed under the gas pedal. :)

They are running fairly consistently in the mid-high 13s at New England, with the only real crappy times I've seen coming from a poorly launched automatic.

Please clarify this. Are you saying completely stock 4.6's with stock tires are running mid 13's?? It's not April first is it?

Al

The one I *know* is 100% stock ran 13.8s at 100 mph. This car came straight from the dealership to the track.

The one I've driven has been "chipped", otherwise all stock. It's run 13.6 at just under 102 mph with my 200 lbs. aboard.

I only go when the conditions are favorable, so I'm probably seeing the best of times. But it's rare to see one run 14.00. If I had to guess, I'd say the majority of the cars I see are running a tuned chip. The chip can eliminate the vague, mushy response in the throttle. It would be the first mod, if I owned one.

I find it pretty difficult to believe that a stock GT is running 13.8's and even more difficult to believe that a stock GT with a "chip" is in the mid-13's. If you were running slicks with some gears then maybe.

I love Mustangs as much as the next guy, but I just don't see those times happening in the real world. Getting a 3500lb RWD car with highway gears and stock all season radials into that time range implies a bit more horsepower than that.

Cheers,

Believe it. Hot Rod magazine last year took a stocker, added a chip (gained a group of HP), and tossed out some weight (jack, spare, rear seat/delete kit, a trick/light-weight set of front brakes) and ran like

106 mph trap speed. They seem to respond very well to little things, much like the old 5-ohs. I want one, bad!

Patrick

In 1967 the W code was the 410 H.P. 427 FE engine. Medium riser heads, sodium filled valves, solid lifters with around 12:1 compression ratio. Ford offered the engines in the Fairlanes only. I bought one of seven produced in

1968. I had a ball with that car. It was considerably faster than any of the super cars on the street at the time. Imagine getting dusted by a 1967 Fairlane 500XL? There were a whole lot of 440 Charger, 428 and 429 Cobra Jet Mustang guys who were left wondering what happened. I took it to the drag strip a couple of times, really didn't get a decent ET, 12.52 best launching at a dead idle, but it ran that at 117 MPH.

some thing is really off here... stock V6's are running mid-15s! They trap around 90...

Al races at altitude. Not sure of his altitude though. I think he's at 5,000+.

Using

formatting link
and using 5,000feet it equates to:

15.35 @ 87 mph.

Absolutely pitiful numbers! So this car must have either been a V6 model, or a 90-year old granny got lost on her drive to the grocery store and ended up on the drag strip.

Patrick

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required