Wireless Telephone Laws

For the benefit of those who plan to visit our fair state come 1 July

2008....... Please pay heed toa couple of new laws.......

Wireless Telephone Laws FAQs Two new laws dealing with the use of wireless telephones while driving go into effect July 1, 2008. Below is a list of Frequently Asked Questions concerning these new laws. Q: When do the new wireless telephone laws take effect? A: The new laws take effect July 1, 2008 Q: What is the difference between the two laws? A: The first prohibits all drivers from using a handheld wireless telephone while operating a motor vehicle. (Vehicle Code (VC) §23123). Motorists 18 and over may use a hands-free device. Drivers under the age of 18 may NOT use a wireless telephone or hands-free device while operating a motor vehicle(VC §23124). Q: What if I need to use my telephone during an emergency, and I do not have a hands- free device? A: The law allows a driver to use a wireless telephone to make emergency calls to a law enforcement agency, a medical provider, the fire department, or other emergency services agency. Q: What are the fines if I?m convicted? A: The base fine for the FIRST offense is $20 and $50 for subsequent convictions. According to the Uniform Bail and Penalty Schedule, with the addition of penalty assessments, a first offense is $76 and a second offense is $190. Q: Will I receive a point on my drivers license if I?m convicted for a violation of the wireless telephone law? A: NO. The violation is a reportable offense: however, DMV will not assign a violation point. Q: Will the conviction appear on my driving record? A: Yes, but the violation point will not be added.

- more - Q: Will there be a grace period when motorists will only get a warning? A: NO. The law becomes in effect on July 1, 2008. Whether a citation is issued is always at the discretion of the officer based upon his or her determination of the most appropriate remedy for the situation. Q: Are passengers affected by this law? A: No. This law only applies to the person driving a motor vehicle. Q: Do these laws apply to out-of-state drivers whose home states do not have such laws? A: Yes Q: Can I be pulled over by a law enforcement officer for using my handheld wireless telephone? A: YES. A law enforcement officer can pull you over just for this infraction. Q: What if my phone has a push-to-talk feature, can I use that? A: No. The law does provide an exception for those operating a commercial motor truck or truck tractor (excluding pickups), implements of husbandry, farm vehicle or tow truck, to use a two-way radio operated by a ?push-to-talk? feature. Q: What other exceptions are there? A: Operators of an authorized emergency vehicle during the course of employment are exempt as are those motorists operating a vehicle on private property DRIVERS 18 AND OVER Drivers 18 and over will be allowed to use a hands-free device to talk on their wireless telephone while driving. The following FAQs apply to those motorists 18 and over. Q: Does the new ?hands-free? law prohibit you from dialing a wireless telephone while driving or just talking on it? A: The new law does not prohibit dialing, but drivers are strongly urged not to dial while driving. Q: Will it be legal to use a Blue Tooth or other earpiece? A: Yes, however you cannot have BOTH ears covered. Q: Does the new hands-free law allow you to use the speaker phone function of your wireless telephone while driving? A: Yes. Q: Does the new ?hands-free? law allow drivers 18 and over to text page while driving? A: The law does not specifically prohibit that, but an officer can pull over and issue a citation to a driver of any age if, in the officer?s opinion, the driver was distracted and not operating the vehicle safely. Text paging while driving is unsafe at any speed and is strongly discouraged.

- more - DRIVERS UNDER 18 Q: Am I allowed to use my wireless telephone hands free? A: NO. Drivers under the age of 18 may not use a wireless telephone, pager, laptop or any other electronic communication or mobile services device to speak or text while driving in any manner, even hands free. EXCEPTION: Permitted in emergency situations to call police, fire or medical authorities. (VC §23124). Q: Why is the law stricter for provisional drivers? A: Statistics show that teen drivers are more likely than older drivers to be involved in crashes because they lack driving experience and tend to take greater risks. Teen drivers are vulnerable to driving distractions such as talking with passengers, eating or drinking, and talking or texting on wireless phones, which increase the chance of getting involved in serious vehicle crashes. Q: Can my parents give me permission to allow me to use my wireless telephone while driving? A: NO. The only exception is an emergency situation that requires you to call a law enforcement agency, a health care provider, the fire department or other emergency agency entity. Q: Does the law apply to me if I?m an emancipated minor? A: Yes. The restriction applies to all licensed drivers who are under the age of 18. Q: If I have my parent(s) or someone age 25 years or older in the car with me, may I use my wireless telephone while driving? A: NO. You may only use your wireless telephone in an emergency situation. Q: Will the restriction appear on my provisional license? A: No Q: May I use the hands-free feature while driving if my car has the feature built in? A: NO. The law prohibits anyone under the age of 18 from using any type of wireless device while driving, except in an emergency situation. Q: Can a law enforcement officer stop me for using my hands-free device while driving? A: No. For drivers under the age of 18, this is considered a SECONDARY violation meaning that a law enforcement officer may cite you for using a hands-free wireless phone if you were pulled over for another violation. However, the prohibition against using a handheld wireless telephone while driving is a PRIMARY violation for which a law enforcement officer can pull you over. CONTACT: Fran Clader Media Relations Office (916) 657-7202 2555 First Avenue Sacramento, CA 95818

Reply to
Spike
Loading thread data ...

You are going to have some really pissy women around there. Well, I =

mean more than usual.

Ummm, Hi Kate! :oD

--=20

I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an=20 ugly direction Barack Obama (From Audacity of Hope)

I've been to a lot of states and have two left. I've been to 57 so far?=

Barack Obama

I cannot swallow whole the view of Lincoln as the Great Emancipator. Barack Obama

Reply to
WindsorFo

Spike wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

Like it's going to be enforced. They'd have to pull over 9 of every 10 cars on the road.

The law is stupid, for this reason. It's not the use of the hand that causes impaired driving. It's the loss of the brain. Studies show that motorists who are talking on a phone while driving are as impaired as a person who has had 3 drinks.

Many accidents happen every year because of cell phone use while driving. It ought to be just as illegal as DUI, and carry the same penalty.

Reply to
elaich

They also found that talking to a passenger can be as impairing as talking on a phone. Yep, I agree the cell phone rule is stupid. Impaired driving is already illegal and by forcing them to a hands free unit it will be much harder to tell if the phone was impairing them when they cause a crash.

There I disagree. Leave it alone *BUT* if they cause a crash while jabbering, then dump extra charges on.

Reply to
WindsorFo

I like the idea of the law... too bad I see so many LEOs driving around talking on their cell phones....

We are all created equal - some of us are just a little more equal than others.

Reply to
Jim Warman

If a phone switches from cell a to cell b in less than, say a few minutes, then it must be mobile so the carrier should turn the phone off. Just an idea.

Reply to
Gill

Regarding bottom posting... do you mean to tell me that it is acceptable to scroll down through umpteen dozen lines of shit you should have already read to get . WTF is that?

AYUP... it seems quite sensible to this old fogey to scroll theough gigabytes of useless crap to finally arrive at our destination... only to find our destination is shall we say "feeble".

Proudly top posted....

Reply to
Jim Warman

Your such an old fogey, why don't you retire?

I think if cells didn't work in moving vehicles that would be great.You got a better idea? Besides grumbling about bottom posts?

Reply to
GILL

And as a passenger in/on some vehicle you're going to get a nasty phone call....

Reply to
WindsorFo

That is why you are supposed to trim the excess. If *I* had tried to make a post identical to what Gill did I would have gotten an error message about the number of lines quoted.

What you like doesn't make it correct. You don't have to take my word for it, it is prevalently mentioned on netiquette pages everywhere.

Reply to
WindsorFo

Yeah, something about my rights to use my phone, damn, I'd like to have all cells in my car disabled. Yak yak yak :) Oh well

Reply to
GILL

"WindsorFox" wrote in news:g1cn8r$3om$1 @posting2.glorb.com:

And just as it was clueless Outhouse Express users who mainly top post, it is more clueless Outhouse Express users who hit "reply" and post their one liner at the bottom without taking the time to trim properly.

Reply to
elaich

In reference to whom? If you mean Gill, tecnically it was more than one line and he doesn't use OE....

Reply to
WindsorFo

Like some CEO riding in a limo who was just on the verge of making the deal of the century (like raising the price at the pumps).

Reply to
Spike

There, in the middle of the night on a cross country run, half asleep at the wheel, came a voice from nowhere, "HEY! WAKE UP!" When the driver came to, 50 yards off the freeway, he could still hear the voice saying, "This is ONSTAR. We see you may have had an accident. Do you need help? STOP! Don't touch that cell phone! You may still be driving!"

Reply to
Spike

Sorry. I was just trying to let people know about the law change so they would not get a ticket and a fine. But.... make a civil statement; start a civil war. :0)

Seriously, since it is admitted that using a cell phone is distracting (I don't know about the three drinks) and considering the numbers of people I see using the phone while they drive, it's enough to make me want to stay off the road.

While many may not agree with me, I particularly like the portion about young drivers. When my son started driving, he needed to concentrate on defensive driving until his experience level had been advanced. Stereos, friends, cell phones, etc, are all things he wasn't ready to deal with while learning to drive. I am very thankful for some rules which led to his arriving home safely. Today, he continues to get safe driving awards from his employer.

At least for the young drivers, I hope this will lower the death rates even further than the previous changes to licencing in California have done.

Reply to
Spike

Driver says "That sure looks like the bottom of the Grand Canyon coming up"

Reply to
Gill

People who claim they "need" a cell phone crack my ass up. What did they do before they were invented & prior to them becoming cost effective to own, which has been less then a decade.

Well mine is built into my Stereo and is completely hands free & voice activated (OnStar) can I keep it?

Reply to
Zombywoof

I get ya on all but that quote at the end. I sure hope that it is healthy food the BIG bites are taken from... 'cause otherwise you are apt to have majore problems at age.... Never thought it would happen to me but all that glop in my arteries led to a 4 way bypass operation at age 50. I'm feeling MUCH better now. :0)

Reply to
Spike

Well the only give-away for someone yacking and driving is their hand to their ear and a big dopey grin. That and they weave like a drunkard. Don't do that and no one will know.

Reply to
Gill

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.