9000 Transmission Decision

Nov 11, 2004 3 Replies

So here's the problem...



At the beginning of the year I bought a 1998 9000 CSE 2.3T "Anniversary". Very nice condition, 96000 miles.



Soon afterwards she developed a minor bump just before coming to a stop. So off to my Saab dealer who diagnosed an "internal fault", took the transmission out and sent it off for a rebuild. Some time, and quite some money later the car came back - exactly the same as before - no change. I did post a query here about what to do next then and received very helpful replies. The other possible causes seem to have been eliminated so to cut a long story short I think I have four options now.


  1. To have the box rebuilt again (garage to pay) at a ZF approved workshop this time! (Original rebuild cost 1400 pounds after refitting). No extra cost to me.


  1. The garage to put a replacement "known to be good, low mileage" unit (again at their cost) - this seems the least satisfactory since it could develop a fault at any time and I would be the 1400 pounds down with no guarantee. No extra cost to me.

  2. To put in a re-manufactured unit from Saab/ZF at around 2500 pounds plus fitting (minus the original 1400 paid to the garage) This figure was an estimate from the dealer.


  1. To import a NEW transmission from thesaabsite.com (there are no longer stocks in the UK or in Germany of the 4hp-18). Link here -



formatting link
At a cost of 1760 US (around 1500 pounds by the time delivery to the UK and tax has been added). This seems quite cheap really.



Option 4 seems the most logical as I want to keep the car for as long as I can, plus I have an insurance policy that will be paying 60 per cent of the bill. Surely a brand new box is the best option anyway - right or wrong?



So, if I go with option 4, is there anything that I should check and double check before the unit starts its voyage to Europe?



Thank you for your time.



P. (remove xs to email)


Damned difficult call - but I would actually go with option one.

This is because a ZF approved shop *should* be able to properly diagnose the transmission before repair to find out why *exactly* the transmission is making the bump. I would insist that the whole car be sent to the approved ZF shop for a good once over to exclude all other systems interacting with the transmission before dismantling.

As you say - tricky call.

I would also go for option one - not least since the garage ( and its agent ) failed to diagnose the fault.

You also have nothing to lose by following this route. A ZF approved shop ought to be able to rebuild decent box from yours ( make it clear that any questionable bearings etc aren't re-used ) - it's not like it's old and compares favourably to option 3.

Graham

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required