Replace or revive? (Was: AAAAA...)

What could replace Saab?

Depends on what you are looking for in a car. If it has to be a Saab, well, that's it. If good engineering is your thing, there is hope. Is it stupid to hope that improvement in environmental attitudes will lead to more cars being better made, even if for higher prices?

A small hope I cherish is that GM will make a pig's ear of their handling of Saab and be willing to sell it back to management, or some similar group, before the name is ruined.

OTOH, a newly independent Saab, probably now lacking their lorry manufacturing arm, would be in the same fix as any comparatively small marque: how to sell good product at realistic prices. They would have to incorporate components from other manufacturers -- and I mean more than generic light bulbs -- but where would they be able to draw the line? What are the chances they could run a solo quality operation and be viable? Collaboration with another respected marque seems inevitable. Be sad if they were eaten by another "GM" a few years down the line.

-- Andrew Stephenson

Reply to
Andrew Stephenson
Loading thread data ...

I don't know maybe GM would inject some cash ? and the designers could improve (for the better). Afterall Lotus have done a lot of good for other cars (inc the TopGear Lada) but I just have reservations I would hate to see in Yankee-ifed or to be give the worst of the Jap influence (although the Japanese quality control would be a great boost across all the GM line).

The BMW'a are great drivers cars but they lack that certain something that Saabs have -iknow "eccentricity".

But this tread has gotten a life of its own. Chris

Reply to
chris

OTOH, poor old Lotus has had more commercially ambitious owners than George Bush. Eventually they all seem to tire of what they bought and sell it on to someone else. (Uh, before anyone says it: the big flaw in my metaphor is that Lotus == high quality.)

-- Andrew Stephenson

Reply to
Andrew Stephenson

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.