Question on AWD.

Jul 21, 2003 23 Replies

I've never driven a 4WD or AWD vehicle to any extent, so I'm only asking this out of common sense (which sometimes agrees with reality, and sometimes doesn't), but isn't the limiting factor in a panic stop (with or without ABS) the breakaway force of the tires to pavement, so for purposes of answering the question of which can stop quicker, as long as either the brakes by themselves or the brakes with the braking effect of the engine can cause all four tires to reach the breakaway point, the stopping time will be the same, everythng else (weight and weight distribution) being equal?

Bill Putney (to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my address with "x")

My '92 SVX LSL has this as well and what I read in the manual is that this was, at least back in '92, intended to take the rear end off line if there was a problem with the torque split so that the car could 'limp' to a dealership for repair as a front wheel drive car. I don't know if it was designed for limited emergency/temporary use or if it could be used in this fashion on an as needed basis. I can look in the owners manual to see what it says if you'd like.

David Bickel

You're exactly right, and it's not difficult to reach that breakaway point, which is why there's ABS.

4WD/AWD has an advantage slowing down with the engine, but slowing down isn't stopping and you'd never have time to do much in a panic stop.

You also get an advantage accelerating from a stop with AWD/4WD since you push against the ground twice as hard if your engine has the power.

-DanD

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required