Since I noticed a couple of timing belt threads this morning, I'd like to throw out a question for the group.
A recent newspaper article on changing the timing belt every 60,000 miles also stated "Independent technicians recommend replacing the timing system idler and pulley which may have a shorter operational life than the timing belt".
What are your impressions on this statement? Applicable to Subaru's? Applicable to some other make? Hype to sell more parts? With no personal experience, I'm guessing that the latter is true but would be interested if anyone has info that is better than my SWAG.
'90 Legacy sedan '95 LegacyLS wagon '02 ForesterS
BoB For the duration of Swen, my address is inoperative.