Some data is available, but in general no you won't likely get your hands on the most current comprehensive test results. The labs are not exactly non-profit organizations. and it is not like looking at the results would change the nature of the debate anyway. Looking at the test results may start more arguments than they settle. If a filter has an absolute rating of 40 microns (meaning no particle smaller than that will ever get thru) then some people will say that is good. Others will say that is bad because it indicates the filter is too flow restrictive. Ultimately it is the job of the engine manufacturer to provide the precise test result specifications for the filter so that no harm will come to their engine.
There are some things you can count on. You can be sure that if someone like Honda was shopping around for someone to build their filters for them that plenty of test results were made available to Honda. Another thing you can be sure of is if you had the test results for all the filters, the OEM brand filter would always come out at the bottom for any of given test comparison. That is the way it works by definition. None of the other filters are ever going to test lower than the OEM. For instance, If an OEM filter is designed to hold 300 psi pressure the manufacturer is not going to spec the filter for 200 psi. Even if they believe 200 psi is sufficient they are not going to see any reason to make it easy on their competitors by letting them build their version of the filter to a lower standard than they do.
If you are interested in filter media testing this I believe is the most recent ISO test procedure:
There are probably 50-100 spin on oil filter manufacturers in the US. Some of the smaller companies do publish the test results for their own filters.
Brake pads are a completely different thing than oil filters. Brake pads are usually not a warranty item. So if you replace the Audi brakes with some other and the car runs into a tree as a result Audi doesn't give a hoot.
That is a very interesting observation. I wonder what exactly you think that test demonstrates? That sounds to me like an observation that is ripe for whole multitude of conflicting superstitions. Isn't the oil supposed to flow from the dirty side to the center hole through the media? You seem to be implying that a filter that is having trouble doing what a filter is supposed to do is the better filter. I do not doubt that there are significant difference in the flow characteristics of different filters especially when you have different amounts of "dirt" in the oil and in the filter media, but i'm not sure what you are saying the results of that particular flow test means. I'm also curious why you specify that the filter must be "held open-end up" for this test. Does it drain differently through the filter media from the outside to the inside when facing up instead of facing down?
-jim