I didn't - I read the big warning sticker right on the steel wheel to which it's mounted, directing one to limit speed to 50 MPH, and also the warnings everywhere directing one to limit use of a temporary (donut) spare to 50 miles max.
Clearly, there are only two reasons why this would be. 1) the tire will be worn out and unsafe if those limits are significantly exceeded and/or
2) the vehicle mfgrs. are worried about wear to the spider gears and/or LSD clutches (if so equipped.)Neither one of those sounds like a Good Thing nor practical if it is likely that one might need to travel farther/faster than that before it is convenient to have the flat tire replaced.
Possibly, but it's a hassle and expense that's fairly unnecessary. And the RFTs actually aren't *awful* to drive on; it's just that I consider
15K mile tread life to be laughable and pretty much everyone who's ditched them for something like Michelin Pilot Super Sports (seems to be the current recommendation for my car) praises the Michelins as an improvement in every regard.Paranoia? Complicated preparations? Hardly, finding a "good used" wheel and tire is not incredibly difficult.
My question was really how aggressively should I be pursuing this given that the tires that I already own are directional. No more, no less. You're clearly making a mountain out of a molehill; I'm already mostly prepared for a flat and have spent more time replying to the inanity in this thread than I have actively worrying about my tires.
Look at it this way - let's say that you are looking to hire an employee, and two candidates are traveling from a decent distance away for interviews. Both candidates have flat tires on the way. Candidate #1 calls you an hour or so before his scheduled interview and says "Sir, this is Candidate #1. I unfortunately have had a flat tire on my way to our interview and while I thought that I'd left myself a little extra time to get to your office I may be five or ten minutes late. I appreciate how valuable your time is and will do my best not to be late but just thought I should give you a call in case it is unavoidable. I will be there just as soon as I can and appreciate your time and consideration." Candidate #2, however, is waiting for AAA or whoever the manufacturer of his car decides to send... and doesn't know *when* he'll be able to get back on the road again, but will likely have to wait at least an hour or so for a tow truck to even show up.
Which candidate do you think is more likely to get the job, all other factors being equal? I don't know anyone in the world who would consider the person who was prepared for reasonably forseeable incidents to be the less desirable candidate!
nate