> somebody on our local automtive newsgroup was questioning why cars don't
> just mix pure oxygen with the gasoline. I pointed out the 14.7 to 1 ratio
> of air to gasoline and the weight of carring all that oxygen around. I
> read that some time ago in an automotive book.
>
> however I thought maybe a centrifuge in the air intake could remove a lot
> of the nitrogen by weight and reudce nitrogen pollution that way. there
> would have to be a heated oxygen sensor in the air intake downstream of
> the centrifuge so the engien control system could could the new optimum
> air/fuel ratio on the fly in case the level of oxygen in the processed air
> varied for some reason. not much different from tubocharing the engine. >
> does that sound feasible?
The way a car motor works, the fuel and O2 are combusted, the heat released from that reaction heats up the remaining gases in the cylinder, primarily nitrogen. That heating causes the gases to expand, that expansion is what pushes down on the piston and does the work. I don't remember enough of my chemistry to calculate what the difference in work between the two concepts would be, but I'm thinking that the actual amount of work from combusting a pure mixture with no inert gases would be less.
JazzMan