Mike Hunter wrote the same tired old crap.
>
>Mike, just STFU. You're an idiot. Any fool can see that there are real
>differences in design and quality between different brands of
>automobile. Any fool except you, that is.
>
>*plonk*
>
>nate
There is VERY little difference. It's mostly perception and preference based on the quality problems of the domestics one or two decades ago. People have long memories. In the 70's you could figure on something going wrong with your domestic several times a year. Now it's pretty rare.
Balls. I've had enough minor issues with my company vehicles to seriously doubt they will be worth repairing, if it's even possible, 20 years from now. There's a 22 year old Porsche in my driveway.
I suggest one go to one of the Ford dealerships that are dueled with Toyota and look at all of the cars in the shop be repaired and you will see as many Toyotas as Fords torn apart. The difference is the Toyota shop rate is at least $10 more an hour and the owner paid 20% to 30% more to drive it home when it was new. ;)
We have thousands of vehicles in our fleet, almost all domestic. Just sticking with "cars" for the moment, generally when we get a new one we drive it for 150,000 miles and about 10 years and in that time it's rare to even have as much as one non-maintence repair a year. The last car I had that has now been retired was a 95 caprice. In the 13 years and 125,000 miles we had it it had to have three minor warranty repairs in the first couple years, after that I drove it for the next decade and never had to do a thing to it but routine maintenance. Our last two E350 Ford vans ran up to 250K with nothing needed outside the changes we made like bigger alternators to run equipment. V-10 automatics that were flogged for 250K miles and they ran like new when we auctioned them off and they looked like new (once they were shampooed). I see the same thing over and over with our domestic fleet vehicles. Yes, you may have had a couple problems but I can tell you that the current domestics are nothing like what they were producing in the 70's. I see a friend of mine plow big$$$$ into his imports while I'm driving one of our fleet vehicles I bought at auction - had 147,000 on it when I bought it, had 190,000 when I traded it in for case for clunkers. Paid $2500, drove it for 7 years, "sold" it for $4500. Put $1500 into it over the 7 years to make it like I wanted.
That's a non-fact, qualifying as a Michael Mooreism.
Equal numbers could be the result of a particular day schedule, more toyotas sold than fords, or that the shop has a reputation for properly servicing the toyota!
In the eighty I damn sure could count on something going wrong with my Toyota three or four times a year. Finally fixed it my getting a Ford. Trips to the shop for repairs immeadiately went to zero per year. So don't tell me how great Toyotas were in the 70's and 80's. They built some real POS just like every other manufacturer.
You won't hear me tell you how great the Toyota's was. I have never been impressed by them. Several years ago my Boss bought a Camry. After hearing so much good stuff about Toyota's I was prepared to be impressed when he drove to lunch. It was as dull a car as I think I had ridden in in years and basically seemed no different in anyway then any number of chevys and fords I'd been in. I know the couple of imports I've had were not at all impressive as far as durability and had nothing else special going for them either.
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.