Tundra a "weak" work truck

RE: Tundra "weak" truck for work. Here is one actual example of Tundra work use. I only own one Tundra, so my expereince could be unique, but I doubt it.

Geologist in Western U.S. with 2001 Limited Ext.Cab 4x4 Tundra and just over

13 years of off-road work experience:

Over 37,000 miles (most off-road, and I mean really off-road) "work" miles.

Have done oil-changes and brake pads only, no serious mechanical problems.

Have climbed/gone down steep off-road up to 25% grades, under load (hauling a lot of rock or HQ size rock core samples, up to 1200 lbs.), and have never even had to throw into 4-low, 4-hi has gotten me everywhere I need to go.

In fact, have climbed some slopes with Tundra that other trucks could not. And yes, on the same day under the same weather conditions.

Have towed full-size, three-phase, Ingersoll-Rand trailer-mounted generators to remote mountain sites up nothing more than dozer or jeep tracks. And the truck bed was very often over-full with drilling equipment including drill rod, tools, 6" diameter auger and hammer bits, that's a lot of heavy-duty steel, folks. I'm not hauling two ladders and a job box to some local, in-town, flat, construction pad build-site.

My Tundra has been far more reliable under regular maint. than other trucks I have owned/used for work over the last decade including:

Ford F-250 (brand-new truck, more time in shop than at work, some within warranty period, some even within 30 days of purchase) Silverado (about as much ground clearance as your standard Cadillac, required to use by employer) Dodge RAM 1500 4x4 (cheap construction, with trim parts and internal details falling off while less than one year old, computer module tanked twice, and the resale value sucked)

Just one Tundra owner's/work user opinion. Your experience may vary from mine. But I have been VERY happy with work performance of my Tundra. For my money, there are few work uses that put a truck through at least as much off-road hell than a geologist's. And the Tundra will still hold a lot of re-sale value, more so than any domestic...

Reply to
Spyhunter2
Loading thread data ...
1/2 ton truck and you're hauling 1200lbs down/up steep grades ??? any mods done ??? of the other brands you mention, i'd prefer none of those, i would prefer a GMC sierra or in that line.

i'm not knocking the Tundra as being a good truck, just my preference lies elsewhere for a full-size pup.

Reply to
Kryptoknight

That's over 500 pounds below capacity.

None needed.

----------------------------------------------------- "Conservative wisdom and principles are derived from willingness to learn, not just from what is going on now, but from what has happened before." - R. Reagan

Reply to
Eric Dreher

If a ton weighs 2000 lb. wouldn't a half ton be 1000 lb? Must be some kind of modern math.

Reply to
max-income

Where is it written that the Tundra is a ½ ton truck? I think he means: subtract the actual vehicle weight from the GVW and that equals the true maximum load capacity.

Tom S

Reply to
Tom S

Take a look at the specs on Toyota's web page.

Sheesh.

----------------------------------------------------- "Conservative wisdom and principles are derived from willingness to learn, not just from what is going on now, but from what has happened before." - R. Reagan

Reply to
Eric Dreher

As I told him, take a look at the load capacity on Toyota's web page.

----------------------------------------------------- "Conservative wisdom and principles are derived from willingness to learn, not just from what is going on now, but from what has happened before." - R. Reagan

Reply to
Eric Dreher

web page says: Payload V8 (manual/automatic)1,575/1,545 (lbs.)

that's really a 3/4 ton truck...

so yes, 1200lbs is approx 375lbs under payload capacity... still scary thinking it's being hauled up/down steep grades with no mods done to suspension or brakes....

Reply to
Kryptoknight

he means he's had 13 years of off-road trucking experience with various pups.

Reply to
Kryptoknight

It doesnt need mods, they are all built in to handle that. Anyone in here ever replace rear shoes on any Toyota produced after 1986 because of being all worn out? You see, there is huge rear brakes on these and with the LSPV, the braking increases as the payload increases. On empty trucks, there is only about 25% of the braking done in the rear with these large oversized brakes.

If its rated for 1,500, the mods are already in place for that.

Reply to
MDT Tech®

I trust that your remedial reading comprehension course isn't over yet. He never said "thirteen years of Tundra". He said 13 years of off-road work experience. Nowhere could one understand that simple sentence to mean that experience being coupled with a Tundra.

Unless you're...well...you.

----------------------------------------------------- "Conservative wisdom and principles are derived from willingness to learn, not just from what is going on now, but from what has happened before." - R. Reagan

Reply to
Eric Dreher

Or a democrat!

AN increase to them is a cut! ;-D

Reply to
MDT Tech®

LOL! That's the most delicate, _brutal_ response I've seen lately. :^D

Tom S

Reply to
Tom S

They must have fixed the brakes then... My 2000 Tundra 4x4 has the shitiest brakes I've ever had on a stock 4x4. Aftermarket made them better, but the brakes on my 2002 Dodge 1500 4x4 are WAY better.

Cliff

Reply to
CHChammer

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.