Hello everyone. I have a 1986 Volvo automatic 240 DL sedan with aroun
190,000 miles on it. About 3 weeks ago I took the car to my sho because it was leaking brake fluid and the pedal was getting softer an softer. They found a broken brake line as the cause and successfull repaired it. They did not mention any other braking issues. Now toda while I was driving on the expressway, I hit a small piece of meta debris at 65 mph with my right rear tire causing an immediate an severe blowout. (luckily I kept good control and no crash or othe damage occured, but i was unable to locate and inspect the piece o debris i struck, as the tire explosion probably sent the debris flyin into the grass.) When the government tow truck showed up (The state o Illinois has a free motorist assist program for cars on the expresswa in Chicago with minor problems. The program is free and the drivers ar employed directly by the state, therefore they have absolutely no reaso to lie about needed repairs.) and he took the bad tire off (after som major difficulty with a rusted log nut) to put the spare on, he becam very suprised and said that my brake pads were horribly worn. When asked him if he had ever seen worse, he said yes, but not many. Now have no knowledge of how the volvo brake pads normally look, so I too his word for it and promised to have the pads inspected. He als remarked that the rotar appeared very worn ("like a CD"?) and neede replacement, and he even said the calipers were in poor shape. He als said I could slam on the brakes one day and the caliper would brake of and I could have an accident. I tried to tell him repeatedly that just had a brake repair and that the shop said nothing. I also tol him that since the repair, i have noticed no braking problem whatsoever, but he didn't seem to believe me. He really scared me, s after he changed the tire, I took the car to a Different repair shop to get the destroyed tire replaced, and while there I also asked the to specifically look at the braking system of that tire, esp the brak pads. After they finished, to my suprise, they told me the brake pad and other braking components on the entire car look to be OK and do no need to be replaced right now. Additionally, while the screw spindle and the part where the tire sits are somewhat rusty looking, I hav always had brake work done as needed and have not noticed any problem (ie squeeky or spongy) other then the brake line repair. [maintenanc within the prior four years (time since i acquired the car) include new master cylinder, new pads, new calipers, ground rotars, all ne brake lines, and other misc brake items] My questions are who do yo think is right? Could the government tow driver simply be unfamilia with the appearance of older volvo brake pads and other parts, an mistaken that for worn parts? In other words, does the older 240 tak a smaller or otherwise different looking brake pad then typica domestic cars?? Or could both shops be wrong and the tow drive correct? What would you do in this case? Thank you for any help o insight-- wirry142
----------------------------------------------------------------------- wirry1423's Profile:
formatting link
'6View this thread:
formatting link