safety vs. model number, model year for US volvos

You can't go wrong with a well maintained '88 to '93 240, all of the bugs were worked out by then and they run forever with basic maintenance and replacement of wear items. The 700 series of the same vintage is also a good choice as it uses the same drivetrain. For a few more $$$ you could step up to the 900 series, also with the robust B-230/AW driveline. Dave Shannon daveshan@DIE_SPAMMERScox.net (Spring Valley CA)

1984 245DL 200K 1984 245Ti 190K 1988 240DL 190K '01 Jeep Sahara 15K

Speaking strictly of safety you really can't go wrong, all Volvos are very safe cars, and it's hard to say which is more safe than another. For other reasons I would definitly avoid those with the V6 engine, turbo (great but not for a beginning driver), and the troublesome ZF automatic transmissions used in many of the older 700 series cars.

I'm guessing you're in the US since you talk about automatic shift and are considering the 'big' Volvos. If not, what about a 440? They're considerably smaller and much cheaper on insurance. Plus, she can then learn the manual gearbox (in the UK, most cars are manual and if you have an auto licence, you can't drive anything else).

For the money, you'd also get a newer car, which must be a bonus, especially in terms of safety, reliability, rust-limitation etc? I've just picked up a '95 440 with 87k for £1,300.

Just a few thoughts. Might not be relevant though.

Regards etc, Richard Carter

=======================richard at rjcarter dot net

Although all Volvo's are generally "safe" compared with most other cars, it's worth noting that SIPS (Side Impact Protection System) came in with the

900 series cars. Seeing as safety is your prime consideration, it's probably worth considering. As no doubt someone will mention, the ZF auto boxes were more troublesome than the AW. Also go for an estate if you want a more useful car, which will have better resale value later on, which are also considerably easier to reverse (you can see where the corners are!)

The 'little' (in Volvo terms) 440's are good cars, although I have never been a fan of the French engines, which are no way up to the longevity and reliability of the pucker Volvo lumps. The 8-valve Volvo engines will give you the greatest life expectancy with minimal cost to keep alive.

Graham W

Here is the real world fatality and injury data from:

The injury index reflects the injury insurance costs experienced for each model. An injury index of 100 is normal for that year. Lower is better.

1989-1992 Volvo 740/760 Station Wagon ---- injury index of 47 Volvo 240 Station Wagon -------- injury index of 74 Volvo 740/760 4-door ----------- injury index of 89 Volvo 240 4-door --------------- injury index of 93

1993-1995 Volvo 850 Station Wagon -------- injury index of 50 Volvo 940/960 Station Wagon ---- injury index of 59 Volvo 850 4-door --------------- injury index of 66 Volvo 940/960 4-door ----------- injury index of 79

1996-1998 Volvo V70 Station Wagon -------- injury index of 46 Volvo S70 4-door --------------- injury index of 77 Volvo 960/S90 4-door ----------- injury index of 85

1999-2002 Volvo V70 Station Wagon -------- injury index of 42 Volvo S60 4-door --------------- injury index of 59 Volvo S90 4-door --------------- injury index of 61 Volvo S40 4-door --------------- injury index of 85

and from:

The death rate reflects the number of deaths per million vehicle-years. Lower is better.

1994-1997 Volvo 850 death rate ------- 39 Pontiac Sunfire death rate - 206 Geo Metro death rate ------- 212

I know most people here might yell at me, but a 1996-1997 850, naturally aspirated model. 1996 was suppose to be the best year for them. The car will have more safety features then the 240, a newer, more modern engine that should drink less gas. It will also have front wheel drive, probably a good thing for a newer driver, especially in winter. It also will have sufficient power for her to easily merge onto any freeway (honestly, admit it the NA

considerably

[ ... ]

The _last_ thing you need to do is give a teenager a fast car; it just lets them get into trouble more quickly than they realize they're in it, and gives them less control (more power means breaking the wheels loose easier) to get out of it. A slower car is safer and more predictable for beginning drivers; merging into traffic involves more than flooring the gas pedal.

Gary

I cannot agree with you more.

Well I'm 20, so I am just out of my young driver phase.

Now yes, too much power is a bad thing, too little is also a bad thing. There is a middle ground, that is why I said the NA 850. We have a 960 at home, and that was a good learning car, more power then the 850, and with rear drive made it interesting learning how to drive in the winter. I'd say it may have had too much power for my testosterone filled body at the time, but it was a lot more comfortable to drive that car then our old VW. That old thing used to stall a lot, have trouble starting on hills, and merge onto the highways.... Now this was all do to a sever carbon problem in the engine, and ancient spark plugs, and a terribly mounted exaust system (not bas design, but the hangers would break and the system would rattle and make the car kick back on startups).

I definitly agree, I love my turbo, but before it (while I too was still a teenager) I had a woefully underpowered Ford Ranger (found out later the timing belt had been off a tooth) and while it had trouble getting up to freeway speed in the first place, I wouldn't say that was unsafe, I just had to watch for an opening and gradually increase speed to get in, never caused any problems.

As I said though, the turbo is great, I love it, but more than once I've ended up sideways or had a very close call when the road was wet, the boost hits and the back end tries to come around, it happens shockingly quickly and you really have to expect it. Power can get you out of trouble, but 9 times out of 10 it gets you into more and only an experienced driver should have a powerful car.

The stock N/A B230F isn't bad, I drove my mom's wagon again the other day to haul some stuff and was just thinking how well it does with what power it has. Low end torque is even better than my turbo, and it has no trouble at all getting to 70 mph. Yeah it's not particularly quick to pass at highway speed but you can hit 60 in 3rd gear in a reasonable amount of time.

Not so fast Hoss. There's a good reason insurance companies consider you in the young driver phase until 25. You don't need a lot of power to merge onto an interstate. From the perspective of learning good driving skills, it's a liability since less need to look/think much ahead. With 50% more horsepower, a young driver can get into trouble much, much faster. 114 hp is plenty, and knowing that you can't stomp on the pedal anytime you need a bit more will make one a better, safer driver. If you don't believe me, rent a Uhaul van for a day (or pull some plug wires on the 960) and see how your driving habits change from necessity. As far as which Volvo, the 850 is unnecessarily quick for a new driver. I prefer the 240 over the 740, but 240 wagons are generally more expensive than 740s of the same year. 240 has more room, feels tougher, hold value better and is the classic Volvo. However, IIRC the 745 may have better driver visibility since door bigger and post is farther back. Avoid sunroofs (leakage) and my experience is that alloy wheels warp very easily (stick w/ steel). Years with ABS brakes and SRS (airbag) may impact your decision, though I don't particularly like ABS (something to go wrong $$) and I'm not sure airbag necessary/safer.

ABS, at least modern ABS system have been proven to be safer, but you must know how to use them. Airbags IN CONJUCTION WITH SEATBELTS!!! and this can't be stressed enough, and when you are the proper distance away do safe lives, side airbags are known to help out too, safety belts do the most tho. Remember the 850 is also designed to crush better then the 240's, tho a 240 won't need as much work for a fender bender.

We've never had issues with sunroofs, or alloy rims, tho I had to replace one (slammed into a curb avoiding an oncoming car that went into my lane) and it was quite expensive.

And you know what, power does not change how a person drives their car, unless it's to compensate for power. If you are an aggressive driver, you will drive as aggressively in any car. I found I drive more aggressively with a standard transmission car, with not as much power then I do on a powerfull automatic. I think the problem is with young drivers is that their parents do most of the teaching, and they don't teach them any bit of respect. I took a driver training course (almost mandatory or your insurance is huge dollars), then my dad made sure I could handle any situation likely to be encountered, and he gave me plenty of literature to read. Sure I speed a little, still do.... but nothing greater then the road and weather can handle, and never speed in traffic.

I stand by saying the 850 is a better car for a young person... For safety, dependability, and another thing IMAGE.... as good as the 240 is, no one likes the style of them... well I kinda do, but I like Volvo's.

Leaking sunroofs are a known Volvo issue (which stains the headliner) and alloys have a tendency to warp/bend, possibly from curbs as well as from incorrect tightening and heat. Had to replace all 4 on a 745 in 70K miles, and not one from potholes or curbs. $$. Have only replaced a couple of steel rims in around 500K miles with 245s.

As far as image, depends on your region. I live in a college town and the 240 is preferred by kids. Most think the 850/v70/940 looks like they are driving their parents' car.

I don't live in a college town, but live in an area of Chicago that is favoured by younger folk (the under 30 crowd), Wicker Park. The

240 is _definitely_ more popular than the 850 with that set.

Wow, most people I know wouldn't be caught dead in a 240 (mainly because there are hardly any left, and the ones that are, are generally looking a little rough).

Just depends where you are, the area I live in is crawling with 240's, a great many of them in very good to excellent condition. A few hours south in Oregon there's even more, Portland has swarms of Volvos.

Agreed completely. They salt the streets here, and there's still plenty of 240s around. Also, you have to realize that the young folk who live in Wicker Park are, shall we say, artistically inclined? Good looking cars aren't their highest priority.