I believe it had to do with reducing tariffs and/or import taxes, where the greater the "local content" of a product, the cheaper it was.
I believe it had to do with reducing tariffs and/or import taxes, where the greater the "local content" of a product, the cheaper it was.
I did wonder, but IIRC that GM was made in France.
That's not why I asked...
The (meager) evidence I've gathered is that it's the ZF that's less reliable.
Are you implying there's a difference in reliability between Steptronic and non Steptronic autos? Would seem unlikely to me since it's only a change to the control gear.
Some early 4 speed ZF did fail early when subjected to a US emission test which IIRC involved prolonged revving in neutral. But think this was fixed by the time the 5-speed arrived. Only 'straw poll' I have is that the 5HP19 as fitted to my 528 doesn't go for much on Ebay - so there can't be much of a demand.
I don't know that's the case. I think that Step=ZF. Maybe.
In the UK Steptronic was an option with the ZF box. I thought the same applied to the GM in the US.
AFAIK, it was an abrupt switch, on a per-model basis. Up to a certain time, if you got an auto with a certain model, it was not a Step, with no "add Step option" available. The Step auto was phased-in, not coincidentally about the same time that ZF was phased-in.
I have a fairly early E39 - '97 - and that has Steptronic. Think it was an option here from release. Of course in the UK there were base models not available in other countries - and plenty of those don't have Steptronic.
I thought all 6 cylinder E39s started off with the GM transmission in the US.
If it had a GM then it was not a Step. That's my theory that I think it true.
Any USA early E39 owners care to chime-in?
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.