>>
>> I'll try a less polite way, then.
>>
>> Moving your reply, above to its present position below mine allows it to
>> be read as as part of a conversation.
>
>
> The very first thing I did in order to read your reply was SCROLL TO THE
> BOTTOM and start reading.
You read my reply without any idea what I was replying to?
You could have just as easily posted at the top.
Where it would have made no sense. In order to comprehend the reply you had to know what it was a reply to. Even you had to figure out that it was in reply to what you had said. Someone else reading my post without having first read yours would have no idea what was going on.
>
> The rest of your post is pure nonsense trying to impose a presupposition
> of attitude on writers. Its meaningless.
It has nothing to do with attitude. It has to do with presenting parts of an ongoing conversation in a comprehendable manner. Unless, that is, you are concinced tht only your contribution matters. Then you may as well snip everything and just post your comment.
>
>
>> Top posters have no interest in entering into a conversation, only in
>> firing off essays, witty one liners, etc. which are intended to stand on
>> their own rather than contributing to a conversation with other posters. >>
>> Top posters are revealing that they have no respect for others
>> contributions, they assume that their brilliance simply replaces
>> everything that has been said before , and that readers will not profit
>> by knowing what they are replying to..
>
>