While pondering something else which I don't need to go into I started thinking about all the non trivial design and machining faults that seem to creep into OE car engines despite the amount they spend on R&D. Here's a listing of some which spring to mind.
Ford Crossflow - Uneven machining of the valve spring seat depth from one end of the head to the other (only an issue with modified engines though) Ford Pinto - cam lobe and finger wear Ford CVH - cam lobe and lifter wear Ford CVH - excessive cylinder bore wear Ford 2.0 DOHC - cam chain breakage Ford Zetec - hydraulic lifter pump up and 'valve sticking' Lancia Gamma Flat Four - cambelt breakage and bent valves with steering on full lock (one cam drives the PS pump) Peugeot 205 1.9/1.6 - cylinder head bolt threads in the block stripping when the head bolts are torqued up to OE specs Peugeot 205 1.6 only - cam lobe and lifter bucket wear Rover K series - cylinder head gasket failures Triumph TR6 - excessive crankshaft thrust washer wear Vauxhall XE 2.0 - porous 'lost foam' cylinder head castings leading to oil and water mixing Vauxhall V6 - porous oil/water intercoolers Vauxhall various - cambelt tensioners breaking
No doubt there are many others - by all means list your own.
Seems to me you rarely/never get the OEM to hold their hand up and admit to any of these even though they are well known in the trade. It strikes me that OEM fault claims should be recorded and made publically available and that once a fault exceeded a certain level of claims (maybe 1%) it should be deemed a design fault and be repaired FOC even if the car is outside warranty period. That might keep them a bit more honest. Of course you get recalls on safety related issues like Mercedes A classes falling over, Firestone tyres exploding etc but never on engine/gearbox or similar components.