Lynyrd Skinhead (the_ghost_of_PORK firstname.lastname@example.org) gurgled happily,
sounding much like they were saying :
The usual 12-year old used car stuff. Watch the rear subframe bushes, too -
they can part company. ZXs are fairly simple to sort most things on.
So at least you don't have the head problems to worry about.
I've never driven a 1.4 petrol ZX (I'm not sure I've ever driven *any*
petrol ZX), but I can imagine they'd be fairly similar. Don't expect any
speeding tickets, and don't expect to get too many customer loyalty points
off your local service station.
How keen a driver is she? They both share pretty much the same blend of
great ride and peppy handling, although the diesel is a bit heavier up
front, which is detrimental to handling.
Neither is what one could consider quick, but the 1.4i is quicker than the
1.9d on paper. It's a couple of seconds quicker to 62 mph (more or less)
and a few miles per hour faster at the top end. However, the performance
differential is in how they're driven and whilst most people would think
that the 1.9d was sluggish, checking their speedos there would be very
little in it.
The 1.4 needs revving for full performance, especially when heavy, whereas
the diesel can provide most of its performance without exceeding 3,500 rpm
(again, more or less). The heavier the cars get (i.e. the more people and
luggage you put in there), the quicker the 1.9d gets relative to the 1.4i.
Finally, that 1.9d ZX has a wonderful "diesel lope" ability. It's lovely
and flexible, so on many trips once outside of the city one can leave it in
Finally, for fuel consumption, the 1.9d should be around 25% more economical
than the 1.4i.
DervMan ( email@example.com) gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying :
I've just done the thick end of 500 miles following a ZX 1.9D with a 2cv on
a car trailer behind it - and it did BLOODY well. Sure, some of the steeper
hills dragged the speed down badly, but all things considered, I don't
think a 1.4 would have done anything like as well.
I got a '97 ZX 1.9D in 2001, with 75.000km. Now it has close to
150.000km and only fault so far is that a %!$&%$& mechanic decided it
would run just fine with petrol (!). That was about 20.000km ago so it
seems no damage was done despite wife running about 30km with it.
I have done a couple 2.000km trips (fully loaded) and car has perfomed
flawlesly. I wish I could say the same about my XM ;-)!
Lynyrd Skinhead wrote:
JOSE V. GAVILA
La Canyada - Valencia (Spain)
Citroen XM 2.0 CT Turbo (1992) http://jvgavila.com/xm.htm
Opel Astra 1.6 16V (1995)
Citroen ZX 1.9D (1997)
Yamaha FJ1200 (1992) http://jvgavila.com/fj1200.htm
Honda Foresight 250 (1997)
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.