I really dont get what you're trying to say, apart from the blindingly obvious 'it does not imply daily use'. That statement *appears* to imply that you think that it does not imply daily use. ANY insurance policy for a car implies as much use as you want (limited mileage policies notwithstanding) for the travel types that you are covered for. Having a clause that permits travel for commuting purposes, it is absolutely categorically valid that you can go to work in it every single day of the year. All you have been saying to defend your position is that going once a year or every day still requires commuting cover, and I've not suggested otherwise. Yes, you need commuting cover if you ever want to use it for commuting. However, you DONT need 'lots of commuting special cover' if you go every day, as opposed to vanilla flavoured 'commuting cover'. Thats it. Its not hard to grasp. You have commuting cover? Great! Go to work as often as you like. There isn't a limit. The cover does imply that you can use it every day.
Your argument appears to be that it isn't an orange, so its an apple. I've agreed it isn't an orange. But it isn't an apple either. The fact that any commuting at all requires commuting travel doesn't mean automatically that its only a given amount thats covered. Show any unlimited mileage policy that covers commuting, but LIMITS the amount of times you can use that cover.
No, thats categorically not so, and what you've written to justify your position is completely unrelated, since all you've said is that you must HAVE that cover in order to use it for that purpose.