Hybrid Lovers Read This and Lament

Nov 20, 2005 134 Replies


The Fuel savings from owning a Prius are soon overshadowed by the


>costs involved in maintenance: alignments up to twice or more a year,
>replacing "special" tires that cost $150 each up to every 7,000 miles,
>power and fuel economy "mystery" drops, software crashes that leave
>you in a coffin driving 65 on a freeway. Toyota needs a big boot up
>their rear for this lemon. Let us all sue the bastards for allowing
>this known defect to continue to roll.
>
>
formatting link

>
formatting link

>
formatting link
>
> Janet of Sarasota FL (11/24/04):
>After less than two years and 16,000 miles my front tires are falling
>apart on my 2002 Toyota Prius and back tires practically threadbare.
>Neither the car dealer nor the Bridgestone dealer is willing to give
>any compensation for tire replacement. I have photos of the tires and
>had my husband not looked at them recently I could have had a major
>accident on I-75 from a blowout. The manufacturer and Toyota both knew
>about this problem and they now use different tires on the 2004 Prius. >
>Toyota Prius
>. Availability
>. Battery
>. Fuel Gauge
>. Insurance Costs
>. Service Delays
>. Tires
>. Transmission
>. Happy Hybrid Owners
>---
>News
>. Prius Tops Consumer Satisfaction Survey
>. Hybrids Don't Always Deliver the Expected Fuel Economy
>
>
>It is costing me over $400 to replace the tires and have car aligned
>so the savings in the gasoline was moot. They should have had a recall
>on them before someone is maimed or killed.
>
>Howard of Inver Grove Heights MN (11/12/04):
>I have a 2002 Toyota Prius. It came with Bridgestone 175/65-14
>Protenza tires. At about 24,000 miles the right front blew out at
>highway speed. I was able to pull to the side of the road without
>incident and change the tire. Upon examination I discovered that the
>sidewall at its junction with the tread had separated with about a 4"
>tear. The tire was evenly worn. I purchased a repacement tire from
>Bridgestone but they would give only a $10 discount on a new tire. >
>Several weeks later I noticed that a tire appeared to be
>underinflated. Upon examination I discovered that this tire had the
>same defect as the one stated above but the tear was only abount 1
>inch. I replaced this tire also. The Prius went in for scheduled
>maintenance about a week later and they found yet another tire with
>the same defect. (I cannot totally fault the manufacture here as this
>tire did show a wear pattern indicative of underinflation) I have
>replaced all tires with another brand. I will neither buy new tires
>nor purchase a new vehicle with Bridgestone/Firestone tires on it. >
>Andrea of Plano TX (7/8/03):
>My complaints are numerous (2001 Toyota Prius):
>1. Front end alignment -- cause unknown. Several alignments, still >doesn't track well.
>2. Gas tank problems -- went from 45.0mg to 29.5 mpg - took several
>trips to get the problem "solved" -- not sure that it is totally
>solved. Consumption screen is screwy and so is the gas gauge. Also
>told car loses gas mileage as they get older -- car was only a year or
>so old and a Prius doesn't use gas when stopped.
>3. Rack and pinion steering -- several trips to service before they
>agreed there's a problem and fixed it.
>4. 3rd set of tires -- 18,000, 36,000 and about 45,000 miles
>5. Accelerator assembly quit in rush hour traffic -- fixed, took two
>trips. There's still a noticeable drop in power, almost daily.
>
>Most problems "fixed" but I don't trust this car nor do I trust Toyota
>of Richardson Tex to fix my car. The second trip for the accelerator I
>was told there was nothing wrong with the car, but the "sticky" place
>disappeared after second trip. They didn't want to admit they were >wrong.

Is this a Toyota group? It looks like Ford, GM, and Chrysler in the cross-post.

The Toyota and Honda Hybrids come with recommendations for extremely low pressure in the tires, but anyone visiting an appropriate newsgroup (not these), knows that the pressure should be increased, for both handling and tire life.

Other than that, this post looks like ... complete crap.

Clarence, Nomen Nescio, whose real name is Ken Mitchell, drops in and out of NewsGroups and is generally little more than a nuisance. He is what is generally referred to as "A Legend in His Own Mind". His modus operandi is to post lengthy meandering posts, which are most often merely newspaper clips which he has plagiarized. Simply, he's not too bright - which is why he posts through anonymous remailers. He is to be pitied rather than scorned. Sad really.

Here's an interesting article from Car & Driver on the subject:

You may want to read this.

Hybrid issues, and a rising star at Indy. BY BROCK YATES September 2005

I'm not exactly a betting man, but I'll give you 100 to 1 odds that if you're reading this nonsense you are not a hybrid-car owner. That's probably a good wager, considering that the new miracle vehicles are stuck at about a one-half-percent market share of the roughly 17 million annual new car and light-truck domestic sales and that you are vastly more likely to tear up the asphalt in a gas-swilling, earth-choking, mega-speed road rocket like the rest of us motorized Neanderthals.

Of course, if we pay attention to the Cassandra-like fulminations of the liberal media, we might be led to believe that hybrid vehicles are our only hope to save us all from ozone asphyxiation and indentured slavery to the Arab oil barons. To ignore their PC incantations and to continue our binge buying of conventional internal-combustion engines will, according to these all-knowing scribes and electronic chatterers, doom civilization to a dark age embroiled in a heat-soaked Sahara.

Yeah, maybe. Then again, maybe not. Yes, we understand the feds are giving a one-time $2000 tax credit to hybrid owners, and 16 states are offering come-on tax breaks ($1500 in Oregon, $4173 in Colorado), inspection exemptions, and single-driver use of HOV lanes as incentives.

Moreover, the hybrids being sold by Toyota, Lexus, Honda, Ford, and, soon, Chevrolet are all reasonably priced. Example: The hot-selling Toyota Prius-with a three-month waiting list in most markets-can be purchased for under $22,000 loaded (although most experts estimate that Toyota is taking a $2000 hit on each sale). The Pious-oops-Prius costs about $5000 more to manufacture than a conventional Corolla and retails for about three-grand extra.

Now let's jump ugly about the whole situation and talk a little reality. The guys at Edmunds.com, who run hard numbers about the car business as well as anyone, estimate that a Prius owner would have to drive at least 66,500 miles annually for five straight years, or gasoline would have to soar to 10 bucks a gallon, to equal the cost of operating a cheaper, conventional Corolla.

Then we have the battery pack, that heavy lump of nickel-metal hydride juice boxes that presumably improve fuel efficiency (but not that much, according to our road tests). Although the warranties are for eight years or 100,000 miles, battery replacement will cost $5300 for the Toyota and Lexus hybrids, and the Ford Escape replacements run a whopping $7200.

Moreover, the industry types aren't talking about total battery life. Will they actually last 100,000 miles? How will this affect resale value? Will the systems stay at full efficiency, or will they slowly drain power as they age or operate under heavy use? These are questions that remain to be answered, understanding that storage batteries, be they dry cells in your flashlight or exotic Ni-MHs, all have finite lives and store less power with age.

And now comes word that the computer brain inside the gas-electric grids in some Priuses is tending to go nuts. This causes instant blackout stalling at either 35 mph or 65 mph-the latter possibly in the fast lane of an interstate where 50-ton semis running 90 mph can crush compacts like beer cans.

This brings up an undiscussed issue: At some point, all these hybrid batteries will die and have to be disposed of somewhere, somehow. These are hardly biodegradable items like spoiled vegetables. They are in fact self-contained toxic waste dumps. How and where millions of these poisonous boxes will be deposited in the new hybrid nirvana has yet to be considered, much less resolved.

And speaking of the environmental component (the glamour issue centered on the brave new world of hybrids), a number of EMT and fire crews have announced that they will refuse to rescue victims trapped in such vehicles, openly fearing electrocution or fatal acid burns.

As with the now-defunct electric-car miracle, where it was quickly realized that the national power grid could not energize millions of vehicles without massive expansion of horrors-nuclear generation-the dark side of the hybrid miracle is now beginning to surface.

Says a dealer friend whose immense franchise network includes several brands offering hybrids: "There is no advantage to owning a hybrid in terms of fuel mileage when the extra cost of the vehicle is added in. Period. Do the math. This is a feel-good purchase. Hybrids are a statement about the environment, and they simply do not square with economic reality.

"The truth is, although the Prius is selling like mad, hybrid Honda Accords and Civics are backed up on dealer lots. Why? Because they look like conventional Hondas, whereas the Prius has unique styling. It has an iconic status among the Greenies. Like it or not, that's real life."

Until hybrids become economically feasible in terms of cost, reliability, and valid fuel savings and make real sense regarding performance and disposability, we're going to be driving conventional internal-combustion-powered vehicles-either gas or diesel -until rogue asteroids clean us all out.

I personally do not own a prius yet but I think sometimes you have to balance out all of the bad things about the prius with some of the good. A few item I can think of are: no accessory drive belt to replace, no starter or alternator to replace (starting is handled by motor/generator1 and 12v battery charging is handled by a 100amp dc-dc converter with no moving parts that gets its power from the traction battery), long brake pad life thanks to the regenerative braking (some owners have reported better than 50% pad material remaining at 100,000 miles). The way I see it the whole point of owning the prius is not about the fuel economy, it is because they are fun to drive and are 90% cleaner than a SULEV vehicle such as my friend's ford windstar minivan (which has the infamous growling ford power steering pump with less than 80,000 miles on the clock). Also the NiMh traction batteries will not be filling up landfills they are being recycled presumably into new traction batteries and/or being made into consumer AAA, AA, etc size cells for your home use. Speaking of consumer rechargeables the mass-production of the traction batteries has desirable side affects. Less than a year ago the highest capacity AA size NiMh I could find were 2300mAh and those were from

1 brand with all of the others being lower capacity, last week I picked up an 8 pack of 2500mAh ones and there were about 4 brands to choose from at that capacity.

I will rather drive my Toyota than some General Motors or Chrysler made piece of UAW made CRAP any day of the week bunkie.

PFHBBLLTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT !!!!!!!!!! ^ ^ ^ ^ (that's how you write the fart noise for the uneducated among us)

" I am STARTING to hear whispers that, environmentally, the Fuel cell "aint all that green".

The basic breakthrough in chemistry in the area of catalysts is still way in the future for fuel cells. Current fuel cell technology is only possible because of government support and military purchase programs that do not factor in cost effectiveness or long term reliability. People I work with in this field tell me it could be another 10 years before the technology is mature enough for it to stand on its own.

Richard.

The reason the Pruis is selling better than other Hybrids, like the Civic and the Escape, is buyer don't think to compare it to Toyotas similar size car, the Corolla. Buyers looking at the other hybrids have the opportunity to compare it to the convention powered models. When they do it quickly become apparent that the premium price of driving home the hybrid model will buy nearly ALL of the fuel to power the conventional model for several years. When one factors in the enviable cost of battery replacement, at some point down the road, purchasing the conventional powered model over the hybrid becomes a no brainer. I think that says a lot about Toyota buyers

mike hunt

"Backyard Mechanic" >> "The truth is, although the Prius is selling like mad, hybrid Honda

Same goes for fuel ethanol.

On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, NJ Vike quoted from Car & Driver:

No. My officemate has an '03 Honda Civic hybrid. It started giving problems on his way from Montreal to Toronto. The Integrated Motor Assist system went offline, which also meant the SLI battery (Starting, Lighting, Ignition -- the conventional 12v item under the hood) was not being charged. When he limped into the parking lot, his SLI battery read 9.9v.

Towed to the dealer, who after three days gave the diagnostic report: The traction battery's dead. Good thing the battery warranty is 6 years, otherwise it'd be a C$8,000+ event. Dealer claims this is the first-ever failure of a traction battery in a Honda hybrid of any year or model, anywhere in the world (Sure, right...) and that a new traction battery has to be brought in from Japan, which will take AT LEAST three weeks.

Of course, there are multiple different issues going on here. There's the car problem itself, then there's the dealer's fairy tales. I can think of half a dozen courier companies that'll happily get a package from Japan to North America in a matter of a couple of days, so that shoots the "three weeks to come from Japan" theory all to hell. And if this were indeed the very first-ever instance of this heretofore unheard-of failure in one of Honda's high-profile, high-PR-value enviro models, one would think the company would be falling all over itself to make the repair as quickly as possible to keep the customer as quiet as possible about it.

Pah. What resale value? This kind of traction battery failure does NOT bode well for the durability of these cars. Sure, it's covered under his battery warranty. The new replacement battery does not reset the battery warranty clock. What about in 5 years? They are disposable cars. 10 years

*tops*. More like "end of warranty plus time to next failure".

NiMH batteries are indeed hair-raisingly toxic and expensive to reclaim/recycle. Once no longer in the dealer chain, they will simply get tossed -- along with the rest of the car.

DS

I say 100,000 miles for my Ford Escape. That may be 10 years for some people, two or three for others.

The whole idea of hybrids is stupid. Just make cars smaller and leave out all the useless crap. Detroit could easily build a 2500 pound family car that gives 40 mpg and costs $8,000 brand new and gives

250,000 trouble-free miles on nothing but routine maintenance.

Laura Bush murdered her boy friend, was motivated to say this in rec.autos.driving on 21 Nov 2005 09:35:24 -0800:

Then why don't they?

Yep, this is the dirty little secret of hybrids. They are going to be worthless after they hit the end of warranty period because the cost to replace the battery pack will exceed the value of the vehicle.

Have people learning nothing from cell phones and laptop computers where failure to take a charge rechargeable batteries are often the death sentence?

John

Hold on there! I just bought a replacement battery for my Dell Inspiron - total cost $72. It was a little over two years old (a bit soon for failure IMHO). But the cost was only about 10-15% of the laptop's resale value. Certainly no reason to trash it.

Point being that IF the cost of a replacement battery pack for a hybrid was

10-15% of the vehicle's value at the time it was needed, the resale would not be so adversely affected. I admit, though, that the price is unlikely to drop to that level.

Doug

What the f*ck would you know about routain maintenance, Mr. Drive a POS vehicle with bald tires and no dash lights?

Holy s*it, you are making sense.

Then right on cue, you do a 180 and starting talking out of your ass. I suggest you go to China and drive an $8000 car. I think you will be unpleasantly surprised.

Replacing steel with other materials could help bring the weight of cars down, but the price is not going be anywhere near $8k.

--------------- Alex

Cause they make more selling the $50,000 cars with all sorts of useless gadgets. You think they sell AC and CD players and electric seats at cost??

What would you expect form a guy that says Mrs. Bush murder someone? LOL

mike

What would you expect form a guy that says Mrs. Bush murder someone? LOL

mike

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required