The cost of building a vehicle depends on the drive type and the amount of
materials as well as the assembly line time to put it all together.
Contrary to what many believe it costs more to assemble a FWD vehicle than a
RWD vehicle of the same size because of the off assembly line pre assembly
required for FWD vehicles When Chrysler first began building small FWD cars
they sold for as much or more than they larger RWD car they replaced. The
line worker putting a front fender get the same pay, regardless of the MSRP
of the vehicle. Material cost are by weight. When I was still at Ford in
the mid eighties the cost of building a T-Car over a CV is less than $2,000
dollars yet the T-Car sold for $10,00 more. The cost a building a V6 Camry
today is not much less than a V6 Lexus built on the same body. Toyota
spends far less then GM on building their cars let a comparable Toyotas in
size and equipment sells for 20% more. The fact is those that buy larger
cars and trucks are subsidizing the sales of smaller cars, by keeping the
MSRP down so that companies can met CAFE. If it were not for the greater
profits earned by lager cars and trucks the price of small cars would be
thousands more than they are. Look at Toyota, ALL of their growth over the
past ten years has been in lager cars, SUVs and trucks, not in small cars.
Toyota knows American buyer prefer larger save cars ant that has been what
they are building. Today Corolla in larger than the first Camry but buyers
buy more Camry than todays larger Corolla
When GM introduced the Saturn line of cars they set up an entirely new
network to build and sell the vehicles. The reason was to determine the
true cost of building a small car in the US and still earn a profit. GMs
economies of scale were so low they could not determine the true cost of any
of their brands.
When they teaching economies in colleges Procter and Gamble and Bethlehem
Steel are two companies that are referenced in teaching economies of scale.
When Procter and Gambel fist developed detergents to clean close they based
the selling price on the cost of making Duz Soap. When they stopped making
Duz they discovered the same economies of scar did not transfer to
detergents. Bethlehem steel made the finest Tool Steel in the world. When
the bean counters considered the cost of spending billion to make the
process meet up coming environmental laws, they got of the Tool Steel
business because the profits would not be support the costs. Within a year
the cost savings they expected never materialized and the discovered they
were making much more profit on tool steel they thought.
wrote in message
Record profit come from record sales. Americans are buying more gasoline
and other oil based products than at anytime in our history. They are
buying more gas a $3 a gallon than they did when it was only $1
Actually, compared to last year, gasoline demand is almost the same this
year. And per capita demand is down (the population is up).
Gas was about $1 a gallon in 1995. Between then and 2003, 1995 and 2003,
per capita gasoline consumption was essentially flat (up about 0.1%).
The greenhouse gas emissions per capita has remained essentially flat at
24 ton per person in the US between 1990 and 2003.
This makes me think that people got more energy efficient overall.
You always like to pick and choose points in most posts so you can make a
comment on most every post. What I said was, Americans are buying more gas
at $3 a gallon than they did when it was only $1 That is a fact, even of it
was only up about 0.1% FIVE years ago. One percent of millions of gallon is
a $#it load of gas. Try reserching the total amount of gas consumption in
the US. LOL
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.