'They're throwing us to the curb'-Lee Iacocca

not necessarily a ford thing but the downfall of Detroit is a hot topic hear and Lee makes some good points.

from Fortune Magazine:

In a new book, Lee Iacocca asks, Where Have All the Leaders Gone? Speaking with Alex Taylor III, Iacocca, 82, talks about Kerkorian, Chrysler and the future of Detroit

(Fortune Magazine) -- Your third book, due out this month, is about the state of American leadership. How is Detroit doing on that score?

I give [GM CEO] Rick Wagoner a lot of credit. He had a lot of pressure on him, but he kept his cool and he stayed with his plan. Their styling is getting better, and they're doing better. Ford (Charts) has more difficult problems than GM (Charts). It has so much invested in the truck business; it has got to get some good cars. I think this new guy from Boeing (Charts) [CEO Alan Mulally] knows the business pretty well. Not the auto business, but he knows what it takes to run a big organization and deal with the labor unions. As for Chrysler, [president] Tom LaSorda is doing a great job in manufacturing, but I don't know what's going to happen. I'm reading about it every day. I would hate to see Chrysler go under. It would be tough to live with.

There are four apparent bidders for Chrysler, including Kirk Kerkorian's Tracinda, which has offered $4.5 billion. What is your take?

I read about Kerkorian's bid with interest, especially the part where the New York Times said I supported it, but I had nothing to do with it. I've decided to stay neutral on this one.

What do you think Kerkorian would do with Chrysler?

He's a gambler, and I don't know what his endgame would be. He'll be 90 years old in June, but he's a healthy guy and he exercises a lot. Twelve years ago we [Kerkorian and I] tried to take over Chrysler, and we couldn't raise the money.

How important are the unions to this deal?

Very. The deal is contingent on Daimler (Charts) sharing the legacy costs and the union negotiating concessions. Those are two big conditions.

Who do you think is going to wind up with Chrysler?

Who knows? Private equity funds scare me. Do they really understand the car business? I would like to see somebody with a leadership group that has the experience to handle the dealers and the employees. If I had the money, I'd buy it. I'd come out of retirement to buy it. Chrysler builds great cars. Maybe you could sell off Jeep, but I would hate to see it busted up. I've done my time in Detroit. I live in L.A. now. [Former DaimlerChrysler chairman] Jürgen Schrempp asked me to come work for him, and I said, "Where do I have to live?" When he said, "Stuttgart," I said, "Forget it."

If you were back as chairman and CEO of Chrysler, what would you be doing?

To succeed today you have to set priorities, decide what you stand for. You can't do all things for all people. I think the model lines are too complicated at all the Big Three - too many kinds of cars for customers to assimilate what they're being sold.

In your book you say the news of the Daimler-Benz merger made you "sick." Why do you think it failed?

There were no synergies. None. And culturally the Germans operated differently than the Americans. It was emotional when Chrysler sold out to the Germans. It's extra-emotional now that the Germans are selling - they're throwing us to the curb, in effect.

What's the matter with Detroit?

Let's start with health-care costs - the legacy costs. There are lots of retirees out there. They've earned what they're getting, but we can't afford it anymore. The world has changed. To use a GM number that I quote often, Toyota (Charts) pays $200 per car in retiree health care; GM pays a little over $1,500 a car. That's a tough albatross to carry.

People are living longer, and the government and the union and the Big Three have got to get together and see what they can do to collaborate. The union contract is coming up in September. That's a watershed contract. The current contract is too rich.

I hope cooler heads will prevail, and we'll come to some settlement. But the union is already threatening a strike. They should wait until they get to the negotiating table to start their talking, but they're doing it in the press. We've got to work this out together because it's a matter of survival.

Will Detroit's market share keep slipping?

I think it will stabilize. It's pretty bad right now. The imports have over half of the passenger-car market. I think GM will start coming back a little bit. But as you know, in this business more share doesn't come easy.

Do you blame the Japanese for Detroit's decline over the past couple of decades?

I've taken on the Japanese forever. Toyota's a great competitor. Nissan's (Charts) coming on strong. Honda's (Charts) always been great on engineering. They're good companies, but they had advantages. It's unfair competition. Their market is closed to us. They still manipulate currency. When they come to this country they don't have unions, and that's tough to compete against. Sometimes I think their trade practices are predatory.

In the '80s you suggested raising the gas tax.

Yes. I went to see Reagan and said, "Let's put a 50-cent-a-gallon tax on gasoline. That's $50 billion. We can cut the deficit in half." He said, "You've got to be out of your mind. You don't tax gasoline." And he laughed. So we never did it. Our state and federal taxes add up to about 46 cents a gallon, compared with $5 in Europe.

What do you think of global warming?

I campaigned for George W. Bush in 2000 and against Gore because I thought Gore was a little nutty when he was talking global warming. Now I think it's a serious problem. As I said in my book, I never thought I'd pay $8 to go see Al give a PowerPoint presentation. There has to be a solution that everybody's got to join - the whole planet, not one country - and so I've become a believer. I didn't get too enlightened until years after I left the auto business.

What can the auto industry do?

Plug-in hybrids. I think they're virtually here now. We've still got to get better batteries, of course, but hybrids are good. Expensive and complex, but they do the job and get good gas mileage. That's the wave of the future.

Some people are betting on hydrogen-powered fuel cells.

I think that's way off. Where are you going to get all that hydrogen? How are you going to store it in the car? How are you going to distribute it? That's a long-term problem.

Are you sorry you never ran for president?

I have no regrets, but I am a little despondent, because I love this country and I want to do something. I'm running out of time. But I've got to cure diabetes [through research funded by the Iacocca Foundation].

What do you tell young people who are considering going into the auto industry?

Do it. It's an exciting life. I loved going to work in the morning. I just loved cars. And if you love what you're doing, it shows.

Reply to
Max Power
Loading thread data ...

If Ioaccoca thinks global warming is real, and he was allowed to run an auto company, no wonder the US auto industry is going downhill. ;-)

Interesting story, though.

Thanks.

Jeff

Reply to
Jeff

Is there anybody, outside a cave, who DOESN'T think the planet is warming? ;)

mike

Reply to
Mike Hunter

If you were able to comprehend things, you would understand the Lee Iacocca was talking about man's contribution to global warming, as well as the solution to the problem.

However, your ability to comprehend things has yet to be demonstrated.

You claim to be a former engineer, but don't have the ability to do in-line posting.

Jeff

Reply to
Jeff

The planet is warming. That big bright thing that we see every morning to the east is warming up our planet just like it is warming the rest of the planets in the solar system. Normal cycle. Having said that, we as a society should ignore efforts to clean up our enviroment. The positive changes in our area of the country (southest Michigan) over the past 35-40 have been fantastic due to the enviromental laws enacted in the late 60's.

I am not falling for washed up politicians looking to create a political powerbase by claiming the only cause of global warming is man, those types belong in a circus sideshow.

Reply to
Frank from Deeetroit

What washed-up politician is claiming that the *only* cause of global warming is man?

Jeff

Reply to
Jeff

Heard of Al Gore?

Reply to
Frank from Deeetroit

I don't recall him saying that the *only* cause of global warming is man.

If so many people, including yourself, are paying attention to what he says, I guess he is not washed up, either.

Jeff

Reply to
Jeff

Your assumption is incorrect, I do not pay attention to him. Nothing intelligent comes out of his mouth.

Reply to
Frank from Deeetroit

One would suspect a teacher would be up on this stuff and know to whom he was referring. ;)

mike

Reply to
Mike Hunter

Gore may need to run for some office, to earn enough to pay his horrendous electric bills and buy gas for his big SUVs ;)

mike

.

Reply to
Mike Hunter

He has Secret Service protection, you and I and everyone else is paying for his SUV motorcade. More reason not to believe any of the carbon dioxide spewing out of his mouth.

Reply to
Frank from Deeetroit

Learn the truth yourself, email any university that studies astronomy, ask them for temporatures of the planets over the past 20 or so years, decide for yourself.

Reply to
Frank from Deeetroit

Hydrogen is the most common element in the universe.

Reply to
Frank from Deeetroit

It is quite common on earth. In fact, I have moles and moles of hydrogen in my body. The problem is that the hydrogen is, inconviently, bond up with other atoms as parts of molecules like carbohydrates, water, lipids, nucleic and amino acids, protiens and urea.

To use hydrogen in fuel cells, it needs to be elemental hydrogen (H2). Unfortunately, it takes lots of energy to make H2 from water.

Where are you going to get that energy, without making more greenhouse gases? Are there better uses for that energy, like electricity?

Jeff

Reply to
Jeff

No, actually *stupidity* is the most common element...

Hydrogen is ubiquitous, but, the most important fact, one that Lee Iacocca surely grasps, and you apparently don't, is that hydrogen gas that is free for the taking, not part of a chemical compound, is very, very uncommon on earth.

In order to separate hydrogen from whatever other elements it is combined with, you have to expend energy, more energy than can be recovered by burning or recombining the hydrogen with oxygen in a fuel cell. Thus, when people tout hydrogen as a solution to our energy problems, I have to just chuckle to myself. Hydrogen is an energy storage medium at best, it will not *ever* be a primary energy source on earth (unless fusion is perfected).

Reply to
Mark Olson

Ahem, I made a sarcastic statement about Iacocca quote "Where are you going to get all that hydrogen?", but not about how common hydrogen is.

Increased costs along the lines of making ethonal. Gasoline, and the amount of energy contained in gasoline, is the least expensive source of fuel for an automobile.

.
Reply to
Frank from Deeeetroit

Diesel is less expensive for the same amount of usable energy.

Jeff

Reply to
Jeff

Currently the hydrogen used for vehicles and stationery units, is reformed from NG and it costs around $20 to do the work of one gallon of gasoline.

The future of the use of hydrogen looks like it will be more apt to be used as a fuel to be burned in an internal combustion engine, rather than the current $15,000 per vehicle cost of building the number of needed fuel cells.

The first hurdle that must by overcome are the current environmental laws that make it impossible to build the totally new system that will be needed to distribute hydrogen to all parts of the country ;)

Air Products is the leading supplier, search their site for the facts, WBMS

mike

Reply to
Mike Hunter

I thought nitrogen was the most common, am I wrong?

mike

Reply to
Mike Hunter

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.