In many American cities there is no subway, maybe even no bus transport.
Warren Buffet says that railroads are best-positioned to haul the raw
materials and finished goods for a nation and economy that are bound to
grow. Unlike trucks, trains don't have to compete on congested
highways. Railroads are the only mode of freight transportation that
can handle growth. We have no kind of national mass transit system
as the European countries do.
Mass human rail transit is a step backward in evolution. People no
longer all live within walking distance of a transit station. They were
freed by the invention of the automobile to visit, tour, or reside further
from the tracks, and in any direction.
Freight rail transit is best used for hauling heavy bulk raw materials to
and from sites with storage at a railroad spur. It is not practical to
load all commercial freight onto trucks at manufacturers, take it to be
reloaded onto trains, then taken form the trains and reloaded onto
trucks for final delivery. Time, energy and money are saved by taking
railroads out of the loop.
National security is another reason for keeping trucking capability.
Rail cars and trucks can be thought of as transports with serial versus
random access. They each have their uses but when enemy bombs fall,
serial access is quickly killed. Trucks can drive around bomb craters.
Don't let socialist zealots force us onto bicycles and into railroad cars.
Trains are making a comeback in many ways.
They have luxury for personal travel.
They have speed and comfort.
There are innovations of combining the trains which allow you to bring
you car along.
There are combinations with rented vehicles at stops.
In cargo the innovations that allow containers to be transported
easily of and on.
So the trains do definitely have a bright future and compete well with
other means of transport.
It is already happening
Obama is going in for more and better trains
There is currently a high speed passenger train running from Boston the
Washington DC. Like ALL long distance passenger trains, running in the
US, it is loosing money and sucking on the public teat.
wrote in message news:16462e5c-653b-4cdc-
At least it is for guys like you who work at McDonalds ;)
The Volt and the EV1 is not the same thing.
Only thing they have in common is that they both have batteries and
are over priced, over hyped and one is already over and the other one
may well be over soon.
Volt is not an electrical vehicle so who cares anyway.
If the Volt will be made into an electrical vehicle it might be
interesting but it is pretty surely priced way beyond any reason.
Agree w/Mike on this.
I need three vehicles. I light-weight round-town 60-80 mile electric.
About $ 15,000 in 2010 dollars.
And, a comfortable, over the road machine that gets good fuel mileage.
And, a performance car -- something that I won't care about gas-mileage
wise. (will be driven 3-4K miles per year.
That is most likely the case for many Americans. If gas mileage was
paramount, we would be buying the midget and small cars that are available
for every manufacturer. The fact is Americans prefer the larger safer,
more usable, mid-size cars. GM, Ford, Chrysler, Toyota, Honda, as well as
the European and the Koreans best selling cars are their mid-size cars, not
their midget and small cars.
The best selling vehicles in the US are not cars, in any event, they are
pickup trucks. The best selling single brand vehicle in the US and the
world is the Ford F150, it has been for over 33 years.
I currently drive a 2009 Mustang GT convertible and a 2010 Lincoln MKZ, that
I use when I need seating for more than four people. I don't care about
the price of fuel, but the Mustang easily averages 23 and the MKZ 26.
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.