Well, it finally happened. A couple of days ago, the CEL came on in my
wife's 98 Accord V6. She also reported that she thought the car wasn't
shifting normally. I drove it and couldn't be sure, but I thought it was
not shifting as decisively as it normally does. Fearing the worst, I had
her take it over to our favored independent shop this morning so he
could pull the code. Sure enough, he reported that it indicated problems
with the transmission.
The car has 116K miles on it. We purchased it used (certified, with a
HondaCare warranty) from a Honda dealer about five years ago with 41K
miles on it. Major service interval maintenance has been performed at
the same dealer, and a drain-and-refill was just performed about three
months ago. I am well aware of the numerous problems with the V6 auto
transmissions, as well as Honda's quiet warranty extension on the 00/01
model years and "unofficial" warranty extension on some of the other
years. Frankly, it's ridiculous that a Honda transmission should be
heading toward failure at under 120K miles.
The code was reset after being read today. Assuming it recurs, I plan to
take the car in to the dealer and attempt to make the case that Honda
should cover the cost of a replacement transmission as this is a well-
documented engineering flaw and they have provided similar consideration
in the past to other owners. I'm not sure how much this dealer will be
willing to go to bat for me with American Honda, but I'm prepared to
contact American Honda directly if I can't reach a mutually acceptable
agreement with the dealer. I'm hoping that my long history of Honda
ownership will count in my favor if they're on the fence about doing
For those of you who have dealt with this problem previously, and have
managed to convince Honda to absorb some/all of the cost of a new
transmission, any words of advice as to the best approach to take, or
links to other sites I might want to check out?
Thanks in advance,
motsco firstname.lastname@example.org says...
I don't have it - yet. I wasn't there when the shop read it, and not
being very familiar with ECUs and trouble codes, my wife didn't think to
ask him for it. I called the shop today to find out what it was, but
they'd closed up early (it's a small shop and the two owners are the
sole employees). FWIW, I trust this shop implicitly - they are
knowledgable and honest, so I'm absolutely certain they're not trying to
sell me an expensive transmission repair I don't need.
I'll post the code when I have it. It's been two days and the CEL hasn't
come on again yet after being reset.
It isn't exactly a secret that there have been instances of Honda V6
auto transmission failures in numbers far above what could be considered
a normal statistical average. I don't know exactly how many failures
there have been, and I'm sure Honda isn't eager to publicize that kind
of data, but there have been enough to cause at least one class-action
lawsuit to be filed and the factory warranty period extended to 100,000
miles for certain model years.
It's not just random chance that has caused failures specific to V6 auto
trannys over multiple model years of Accords and Odysseys dating back to
1998. I don't know what else you'd call it besides an engineering flaw.
It's certainly a marked downturn for a company that used to be known for
the superior engineering of its powerplants.
The problem with mine is an increasing reluctance to shift. And as I
mentioned in another post, I don't have the code # yet but will post it
when I do.
It resulted in the largest recall ever, and is the direct result of
Honda giving too much power to the beancounters in the late 80s/early
90s. They went too far, and damn near destroyed Honda's carefully built
reputation. But what did they care--they needed results for next
quarter, screw this long term thing.
The 1998 Accord is, as far as I can determine, not part of the inherently
Honda has very publicly admitted to the existence of several serious
defects in V6 auto trannies for the '99 to '04 model years of various
models, and has been generous in fixing them. Honda has had its eye on
Toyota and their past troubles with certain 1MZ-FE 3.0 V6's, and is not
eager to be tarred with the same brush.
Your '98? Well, it's ten years old, with ten years of potential neglect and
abuse. The wrong fluid, neglected changes, who knows what.
To "mashup" Curly and the rock group REM, "What's the Code, Kenneth?"
OK. I mistyped the model year in my original post. It's a '99, not a
'98. Purchased with 41K miles on it, as a certified used car from the
same dealer that's serviced it since then. The maintenance intervals as
specified in the owner's manual for severe conditions have been followed
since then (it gets well over 90 degrees here for several months out of
Since the tranny fluid changes have been performed at a Honda dealer, I
assume they're using Honda ATF. But this is the same dealer whose
service department aggressively pushes powerflushing the transmission
whenever the topic comes up. I have always refused to have it flushed,
but I did have them do a drain-and-fill (once, not 3x) about three
months ago when they said the fluid didn't look too good. It was due for
a fluid change at 120K (we're only at about 115K now), but I didn't want
to risk waiting for the 120K service if the fluid was showing its age.
I finally had a chance to drive the car today to get a better feel for
what was going on, since the extent of my wife's description of the
problem so far has been "it's shifting funny". For the first part of our
trip today, it drove fine, with no problems. About midway through our
errands, after driving maybe 15-20 miles, I noticed a rough downshift -
much rougher than normal, almost enough to chirp the tires. By the time
we made another couple of stops, it was very hesitant to upshift. The
engine would rev higher, but the car would barely move, and when it did
finally upshift, the upshifts were very abrupt and jerky. Downshifting
was similarly delayed and rough - the car would come to a complete stop,
and sit for a couple of seconds before the final downshift would occur.
It eventually got to the point to where it was almost undrivable, and I
wasn't sure we were going to make it home, but we did. Oh, and the CEL
has yet to come back on since it was reset.
My wife mentioned that the problem seems to be worst in the afternoons,
which are obviously the hottest part of the day. I was hoping to buy a
little time to research the problem further, but based on our drive
today, the car is unsafe to drive with the transmission acting like
this, so I'm going to have to do something sooner rather than later. My
father suggested taking it to a transmission shop to see if it can be
repaired as opposed to swapping it out for a remanufactured tranny, but
I'm more inclined to start with calling Honda's US customer service
department. Since the model year is outside the scope of the warranty
extension, and since it would've been past the warranty period at this
point anyway, I don't expect a free ride, but I don't think some sort of
consideration is unreasonable. With proper maintenance, there's no
reason a transmission shouldn't last for the life of the car.
So, you do not know how the car was driven, or exactly what was put in
there before the 41K mark...
It is possible that the car may have been running non-Z1 for quite
Also, is the radiator full and the overflow at the MAX line?
It sounds like there may be a problem with the cooling system or the
flow of tranny fluid to the cooler. Or, you may benefit from adding a
cooler to the car, like would be added if you were planning on towing
things. Clearly the heat is a factor...
Joe - Linux User #449481/Ubuntu User #19733
joe at hits - buffalo dot com
I've had the same same problem on my 01 V6 Accord. I had about 120K
miles on mine as well and I was unaware of the warranty extension
(somewhat to my dismay when I did find out later). I do not think the
extension was large enough in terms of miles to cover it anyways. At
first the dealership wanted about $3500 but then they matched a $2800
quote from a small transmission repair shop.
I have a friend who has an Accura plagued by the same transmission
problems and having received a similar extension. He's had to replace
the transmission multiple times. The last time he had to replace it
he was outside of the extension, but after some negotiations, the
dealership convinced the manufacturer to provide the parts for free
and my buddy only had to pay for labor. That's the path I'd take if I
had to deal with this issue again.
Update: took the car to the dealer, and as I expected, the tranny was
toast. The dealer quoted $3450 to replace it. I told them I would be
requesting a goodwill repair from Honda, and immediately faxed a polite
letter to American Honda documenting my long history of Honda ownership
and awareness of the problems with V6 trannies over the past ten years
(including a citation of the applicable TSB number). Within a couple of
days, I got a phone call from a case manager in Torrance, and as soon as
he talked to the dealer to verify the service history of the car there,
Honda offered to cover the cost of a remanufactured tranny if I would
pay for the labor to install it ($560). That was all I was really hoping
for, and I expressed my appreciation to the case manager for Honda's
consideration. The new tranny has a 3/36 warranty, and he said he hoped
I wouldn't ever have to use the warranty but it was good to know I'm
covered if future problems arise.
Got the car back yesterday, and the difference is unbelievable. Judging
by how smoothly the new tranny shifts, I have to think that the old one
had been going south for some time, as it shifted much more roughly than
the new one even before it started exhibiting clear signs of imminent
Interestingly, I'd just had a brake job done about a month ago, and at
that time discovered that the front motor mount and one of the side ones
were cracked, so I had them replaced. When they pulled the tranny prior
to installing the new one, they found the tranny mount was also worn out
and replaced it as well. I'd been thinking that something in the front
suspension was worn out because the car seemed to be riding rougher over
bumps than it used to, but after the various mount replacements, the
ride is back to normal. I don't think I've ever had to replace motor
mounts on any of the cars I've previously owned.
This was really the first major repair I'd had to have done on this car
in the 75,000 miles we've owned it. Prior to this, aside from normal
maintenance of brakes, fluids, and batteries, I'd only had to replace
the starter, an O2 sensor, and the factory CD player (which was covered
while the car was still under warranty). Here's hoping for another
similar stretch of relatively trouble-free motoring.
Wasn't 1998 the first year of that design of Accord that went until
2002 (1999 was the first year of a new design Odyssey minivan)? If so,
wouldn't it have similar issues as the 1999-2002 Accord (perhaps worse,
being the first year of a new design)?
Timothy J. Lee
If you have had this car serviced by the "dealer" for the last 5 years.
They may go to bat for you.
10 year old car: At what point do you take full responsibility and own the
I'm curious, just what is your expectation regarding transmission life?
Dave Garrett wrote:
Your expectations are too high for anyone.
While most of them will last that long, mechanical failures do occur,
and at that age/mileage, it is hard to tell the cause, especially if
you don't know the maintenance history...
Joe - Linux User #449481/Ubuntu User #19733
joe at hits - buffalo dot com
you're /way/ too used to being ripped off by detroit garbage whose
design spec /is/ 100k. honda /used/ to make automatic transmissions
that went 300k no problems. that's why people bought them. failure at
detroit intervals puts honda at detroit quality - not good for owner
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.