I am trying to ressurect an 85 Cherokee that has the 2.8 173 Chevy engine. The body is in great shape so the project is worth it. Since it needs an engine rebuild, I was wondering if I can easily put a larger Chevy V-6 (ie motor mounts and bellhousing). Any feedback is appreciated.
A GM 3.4L V6 is a drop-in replacement. Anything different/larger is a really complex set of changes to the firewall and a number of mounts.
I put one in my 84. The 3.4L doesn't support a mechanical fuel pump so you'll have to fit an electrical one. I put mine back near the tank. That and sometimes the flywheel may need new holes to mate up to the crankshaft. I also seem to recall there being some crank pulley and belt issues. Nearly everything else just bolted right back up to it; intake, carbs, pumps, exhaust manifolds (check for cracks), etc.
I seem to recall the motor from an S-10 or a Camaro being a frequent donor.
It didn't really do much to change the performance or mileage. But my old 2.8L was toast (thrown rod) so it's not like I had much choice. Given the time/money spent on having it done, however, I think I'd have been better off selling it and getting something else. Live and learn.
Thank you. That is exactly the kind of information I was looking for. Bill, you are a wealth of information.
It's not that I want to put a blown 5.0 in it or anything, just something with a little more torque. I may try to go with the GMC crate engine HT
3.4L. Which leads me to a new question.
It states on the website
formatting link
it doesn't have a clutch boss cast onto the block. Do I need one? I replaced my slave cylinder about a month ago and with it being a wet clutch it mounts into the bellhousing. The only engine swaps that I have done are on FWD cars, which wouldn't need one either. Isn't a clutch boss an extension of the block to act like a fulcrum for the clutch linkage on other vehicles? I could easily be wrong though. Please correct me if I am. Eric
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.