Thinking of fitting new shocks? Have a look at this site first.
Awesome.
formatting link
- posted
18 years ago
New shock absorbers?
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
18 years ago
Side view is a bit scary on the animation! I'm not going to ask how you happened to er, "come across", this website?
Dave
- Vote on answer
- posted
18 years ago
On or around Tue, 14 Mar 2006 19:23:25 -0000, "Richard Brookman" enlightened us thusly:
Blimey...
- Vote on answer
- posted
18 years ago
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 19:23:25 -0000, "Richard Brookman" scribbled the following nonsense:
SWMBO did not see the funny side of that one....
FF-G is hilarious!!!
- Vote on answer
- posted
18 years ago
I didn't go any further than DD, and the heatshield was glowing just after that!
Dave
- Vote on answer
- posted
18 years ago
...and Simon Isaacs spake unto the tribes of Usenet, saying...
Mine did. She heard me burst out laughing and came in to see what I had "found".
Mind you, ever "A" when set to "Extreme, running and horseriding" seems to contravene the laws of physics. FF+G reminds me why I've never really appreciated big ones. They could have your eye out.
- Vote on answer
- posted
18 years ago
...and Dave R spake unto the tribes of Usenet, saying...
Sent by the same guy who posted the pic I sent you earlier!
- Vote on answer
- posted
18 years ago
On or around Tue, 14 Mar 2006 22:03:24 -0000, "Richard Brookman" enlightened us thusly:
indeed. Mind, I wasn't entirely convinced by the different sized itst being applied to the same basic frame, not quite convincing. wonder if the dynamics are valid?
- Vote on answer
- posted
18 years ago
...and Austin Shackles spake unto the tribes of Usenet, saying...
No, I agree. I think there was one bare lady doing a variety of speeds from walking to running, and a lot of CGI to make the wobbly bits. In which case, one wonders how exactly they know the exact wobble parameters.