Economic driving

Hi all,

I've got a 1997 1.6 Nissan Almera with half a tank of petrol (let the bidding commence for the fuel LOL). I've got to do a few trips betwen Liverpool, St Helens and Bolton between now and the weekend for work purposes. I'm self employed and have to work to earn so can use the petrol situation as an excuse.

For maximum economy what speed and/or RPM should I be looking to keep at on motorways? Am I right to assume I should chose motorway routes rather than stop-start normal road routes?

Thanks for your advice everybody :o)

Ben

Reply to
Ben
Loading thread data ...

Take the train if you're that concerned?

Otherwise, there's no one answer. Lowest speed in the highest gear without labouring. Match the HGV. If you drive with sensitivity to the throttle you'll be just fine. If not, simply slowing down won't make much of a difference.

Check out my article about fuel consumption on my website.

Reply to
DervMan

You can drive at 50mph on the motorway, but unfortunately that will make a nuisance for other motorists. However, you can get away with 60mph by following Heavy Goods Vehicles that are restricted to 60mph anyway. Make sure that the tyre pressures are correct.

Reply to
Johannes

Sound advice. Remember too that tracking that is way out will effect economy. Make sure that all brakes release fully, eg no sticky calliper pistons or handbrake cables. Empty the car of everything you don't need and keep windows closed.

WRT driving, using the brakes wastes fuel, so anticipation is more important than creeping a few miles an hour above your intended speed.

Chris

Reply to
Chris Whelan

Open windows increase drag by about 10%, so if you need to drive with one open, have it only down a jiffy.

Low tyre pressures, binding brakes, engine in poor tune, tracking parallel in that order will lower your mpg the worst.

Reply to
Tim..

Modern aerodynamic cars are best at about a steady 60mph in top gear. Anything more brick shaped will be optimum slower. A van might be best at steady 50mph, or even 45mph, if it's a particularly unaerodynamic with roof rails.

Christian.

Reply to
Christian McArdle

Aerodynamic resistance grows with the speed squared. So everything being equal, 50mph is more economical than 60mph is more economical than 70mph and so on. But the efficiency also depends on the rpm, hence having a good gear ratio for the speed. My Saab has an instant mpg readout. (Why is it called readout and nor writeout?). I certainly find that my Saab is very economical at 50mph and that the consumption always increases (mpg decreases) with speed, just as you would expect.

Reply to
Johannes

Aim for 52 mpg which is what I can get from a motorway trip at 60mph in my

1998 1.6 laguna (petrol).

Stu

Reply to
Stuart Lyon

Aim for 52 mpg which is what I can get from a motorway trip at 60mph in my

1998 1.6 laguna (petrol).

Stu

Reply to
Stuart Lyon

Yes, but there are other issues that don't vary with the square of speed. Some elements are effectively constant with speed, such as lighting, audio equipment, computer electrical consumption and air conditioning.

Fuel efficiency is actually a peaked curved, with the peak varying in speed, but usually quite shallow from 45mph-60mph, there being little to pick between. Above 70mph or below 40mph, efficiency drops off relatively rapidly.

Obviously, every car will have a different peak, depending on many factors. Just turning on the air con will raise your cars most efficient speed.

Christian.

Reply to
Christian McArdle

I don't rely too much on the instant mpg readout in my car. Apart from calibration, it also depends on the slope of the road and the wind speed and direction. However, it is a useful tool for getting an idea of what affects the fuel consumption, and to diagnose a possible problem.

Reply to
Johannes

Cobblers. You may find that a certain car is more efficient (if efficiency is better) at 90 mph compared to 50 mph. Or it'll be more economical at 44 mph...

Reply to
DervMan

As you'd expect then! :)

Reply to
DervMan
[snip]

And since you're following them, make sure you drive right up their arse for the best slipstreaming. It'll probably annoy them, but that's just a bonus.

'course, what's best for economy might not be best for safety ;o)

Cheers,

Colin.

Reply to
Colin Stamp

My Focus will do over 45 to the gallon at upto 75mph, any more than about 80 and that plummets rapidly.

Contrary, the S70 only averages about 31mpg at 65-70mph, but up that to

75-85 and it jumps to 35-36mpg.

Tim..

Reply to
Tim..

==================== If you're a glutton for punishment fit a vacuum gauge and try using that as an 'economy gauge'.

Steady driving without trying to maintain a fixed speed is usually best for economy - all other factors being equal!

Cic.

Reply to
Cicero

But don't compensate by using aircon. If your car's black, paint it white to stay cool.

Reply to
Willy Eckerslyke

As I said, it depends on the car. However, as a general rule, modern, more aerodynamic, and sporty cars generally have their most efficient speed at a comparatively high speed.

It is very unlikely, however, that any normal road going car would be more efficient at 90mph than 50mph, though, as the v squared really kicks in by then. A specialist aerodynamic record breaking car would be required for that.

Christian.

Reply to
Christian McArdle

Uncannily I have access to both the same cars.

As to your S70 figures, is yours a manual or auto? I find that around 70 - perhaps up to around 75 - I can average (according to the computer) easily in the mid 30s - given a long enough run. However approaching 80, or higher, and it drops off quite sharply.

Reply to
Douglas Hall

In message , Douglas Hall

Reply to
Steve Walker

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.