Tim
- posted
9 years ago
Tim
Somewhere under there is an earlyish GT6, straight-six powered Spitfire coupe.
+1
Cheers. It looked Spitfireish but not quite right. Long time since I've seen a GT6.
Tim
Agreed on both counts.
Yesterday, Antiques Road Trip had a soft-top GT6, which I didn't think existed. Did somebody just unbolt the roof?
No, they put a straight six into a Spitfire...
Something that I had always thought a logical move, and really the basic idea of the closed GT6 in essence, but I didn't know that they had actually done it. Were many produced, do you know?
I had a Spitfire engine and O/D gearbox in my Herald 13/60, but that wasn't quite the same!
Pretty sure the Spitfire is only a four cylinder soft top.
And the GT6 the 6 cylinder fastback - although sharing some bits with the Spitfire.
So rather like Herald and Vitesse.
The one in the pic has been jazzed up - perhaps to look like a competition version. Might actually be one, of course, or just an attempt to look like one.
Yep. I think the GT6 was planned to be just a Spitfire coupe, but when they test-drove the prototypes, they found the extra weight made it too slow.
By Triumph? None. Since then? Probably quite a few...
And some tasteless transfers which ruins the appearance. ;-)
Well it is taking part in the modern Monte Carlo rally so I guess it's excused a few transfers. ;-)
Tim
This sort of thing...
Yep, that's what I read on the Wikipedia page, and it makes sense. And there I was briefly thinking that there were some real GT6 soft-tops around, made by Triumph.
But it wouldn't be a GT with a soft top?
The Rally was more exciting when the Mini was winning it. :-)
My dad entered in a MK2 Consul in the late 50s or very early 60s
What's in a name? Besides, that's what the TV programme called it. It should really be a Spitfire 6, though. Whatever, Triumph didn't make it, which is a shame.
Quite a lot. GT stands for Gran Turismo which is a particular body style.
You believe everything you see on TV? ;-)
Yes.
Might have embarrassed the TR performance wise due to being lighter?
True. It would have been the closest to describing it, though.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hmmm. Interesting thought. Maybe we need to find one of the existing ones and find out.
Great. I remember reading a book by Sidney Allard about the Monte Carlo
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.