How wrong you are, let me count the ways...the 2.3-16 pulled an anemic .78g
on the skid pad (R&T) while the 944 pulled .91g. The 944 was the best
handling car you could purchase ON THE PLANET in the 80's and to some
extent the early 90's. In a straight line, you could only hope to beat an
old 8-valve N/A 944 because you would be embarrassed by an old S, S2 or
I ran several tests...first comparing comparably equipped 1987 2.3-16 and a
1987 944S. According to nada.com the 1987 944S costs $3900 in poor condition
up to $6250 for excellent condition. I gave the 2.3-16 the same features
such as leather, sunroof and alloy wheels that came stock on the 944 and
the 2.3-16 is valued at $3400 in poor condition and only $5500 for
excellent. The average price for the 2.3-16 was only $4600, vs. $5250 for
Then the final real world test. I searched at Autotrader for the entire
scope of 1987 2.3-16...the average price...$3407, using the exact same
criteria, the 1987 944 average price was $7069. Until the 968 got a
bit long in the tooth by 1995, you could not and cannot get more sports car
value for the money than a 944, period.
Not trying to start a flame war or anything, just fighting off baseless
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.