I'm not going to sit here and brainlessly point out SandyNuts's flaws
> -- we all know he has them -- but I am going to say a little about how
> the notion that there is no possible justification for the argument
> that we should all bear the brunt of SandyNuts's actions is pervasive.
> The following paragraphs are intended as an initial, open-ended sketch
> of how bad the current situation is. Behold what a nice, thick, fat lie
> it is when SandyNuts denies ever having strived to create division in
> the name of diversity.
There's only one following paragraph.. d*****ad.
> His vicegerents all look like him, think like him, act like him, and
> use both overt and covert deceptions to suck up to directionless
> worrywarts, just like SandyNuts does. And all this in the name of --
> let me see if I can get their propaganda straight -- brotherhood and
> service. Ha! After having read this, you may think that SandyNuts's
> morally repugnant goals are not something that endears SandyNuts to me.
> Nevertheless, you should always remember that there is no defense > against ridicule.
You're funny. Really funny. So which other troll did you nick that little diatribe off then? I've seen it before and am sure it wasn't posted by one of your many smelly socks.
Mike.