t-top stang
Robert321w opined in news: snipped-for-privacy@blithering-idiot.aol.com:
Good to see that my stereotype of Aol'ers gets re-inforced occasionally.
Why the F*CK would you want to take a chance on screwing up a RARE car that's gonna be worth BIG bucks in just a few years by putting a radical engine in it?!!! A car that's APPRECIATING in value right now?
IOW, keep it mild and restorable. The Frame connectors (IF professionally designed and installed) are a good idea... big power in that car is NOT.
Robert321w opined in news:999897...90teen.zzzzzzz@2fukkindum 2 use real internet tools.aol.com:
BTW read the "460 swap" thread just after your post And thats talking about a structurally intact car.
Which the "T" editions are NOT.
1987 was the last year w/ T-top option and there were not that many made
TIM -aka- snipped-for-privacy@AOL.COM
Musttanguy opined in news: snipped-for-privacy@mb-m19.aol.com:
What!!!!!! GAsp!
Well, that wouldnt just mean an 89 T-top was flexy and rare... it would mean it was FICTIONAL!
Well, I'll Be...!!
Seriously... I've heard some say there were 88's but I'm pretty sure there were no 89's.
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required