Very Good Commentary on New ZL1

formatting link
I've never cared for a "winners" or "losers" aspect to an auto comparison article. Even the decades-long rivalry between the Camaro and Mustang don't call for that, since they're two very different cars. Yes, built to compete head-on, but two very different cars.
Just tell me the pros and cons of both, and I'll decide which one is the "winner." (And, obviously, in my case, it'll always be the Ford.)
((Speaking of which, why is my Ford stock in the toilet?))
dwight
Reply to
dwight
I agree pros and cons are most important. But I don't mind winner and loser. It's certainly MUCH better than the indecisive 'there are no winners or losers in this comparison' -- to that I say BS. One of the cars did more things, that your magazine values, better than the other cars.
I don't know. But as long as Ford keeps their present chairman I would keep it.
Patrick
Reply to
patrick.mckenzie84

Site Timeline Threads

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.