whats wrong with a diesel, i have a 1983 buick with a 5.7 liter diesel with
213,000 miles on it, just replaced the injection pump twice, nothing else has been touched, and i have owned it since new......
whats wrong with a diesel, i have a 1983 buick with a 5.7 liter diesel with
213,000 miles on it, just replaced the injection pump twice, nothing else has been touched, and i have owned it since new......
I think though what they are saying is that making something such as a
3.4L V6 (or any other originally designed gasoline engine) and trying to make a diesel out of it would probably be disastrous. I had a friend once that had an old Chevy Caprice that was diesel and it ALWAYS ran like complete crap. After researching we found it was originally gasoline. Although the engine was a different one, the computer wasn't. :) I'm quite sure yours is original. I like diesels for some purposes myself. But things that would drive me nuts is noise and smell. That's one of many reasons I hate those Dodge trucks with diesels. To me they are WAAAAAY too loud, even by Diesel standards. I heard one of the new Chevys, wasn't too bad. I was impressed.Tony
One thing I overlooked in your post. Yours is a 5.7L. :) Which also comes in gasoline form.
Ooops.
Tony
My Blazer's 4.3 V6 was once (historically) a 350 V8, I heard it took GM a little while to figure out the "balance shaft" needed to smooth-out a V-6 that was once a V-8 though. GW
Nick Trouns> God bless GM! They *can* actually build an engine with cylinders cut off
You're talking about the 3.8 V6, aren't you? AFAIK, the 4.3 V6 has a
60° block while the 3.8, as most V8s, has a 90° one.What took a while to "figure out" was the crankshaft to make it even-fired. Oh, well, that's what it takes to be a pioneer.
As for the balance shaft, introduced in the '80s, IIRC, is indeed to smooth out vibrations inherent to such designs. FWIW, Audi announced as a major milestone the adoption of such balance shafts in its 90° V6 engines just 3 or 4 years ago. Hype is hype is hype... ;-)
Yeah I think Briggs & Stratton makes the balance shafts.=20
The 4.3 v6 is a 90 deg motor as well. It is based off the 5.7 (350ci).=20 Basically the only reason 60 deg motors came about is because of compact=20 front wheel drive vehicles trying to make room. Theres no reason they=20 would of stuck a 60 deg motor in a blazer, the most common thing they=20 stuck them in.=20
For several years both engines were options in the Blazer. I can't imagine how underpowered those 2.8s were. That's probably why they stopped the option. GW
B> The 4.3 v6 is a 90 deg motor as well. It is based off the 5.7 (350ci).
The Iron Duke, 2.5l was half a Pontiac 301. It wasn't the first time Pontiac took such a step. The 61 Tempests featured half a 389, and in that case the engine actually looked like it. It had a V-block with half the V sawed off.
I guess that'd be termed a 'slant four'? heh!
Nick.
"Self-destruct
Yes; wierdest looking engine I ever saw.
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.