Questions on 1997 SL2(General???)

hi well the time has come to replace our trusty 1992 sl-1 with a newer model. my wife has picked a 1997 sl-2 at a near by dealership(not saturn) that was originally bought and traded at our local saturn dealership. our old one was as plain as they come with the sohc engine and very little else. the new(to us) saturn has a near full load(less sunroof). the few questions that i have are as follows:

1: are these motors still subject to head cracking/oil burning(like the older sohc models)this is dohc motor. 2): is there anything specific that i should look for that could/would be a trouble point. 3)are the alternators still prone to early failure due to heat/position. 4)are the front seats more durable/comfortable. 5)how are the automatic transmissions in these models(ours was 5 speed std.) are the prone to failures(like my ford taurus) 6)any recalls or tsb that i should know about.

our old 92 was very trustworthy and reliable throughout its life with one alternator replaced,one oul pan and a belt tensioner. any input would be greatly appreciated. tia ,jeff

Reply to
jeff
Loading thread data ...

From what I hear, it is only the sohc head that has the head cracking problem.

Do the 97s burn oil? Both of mine do to an extent (I have to add about a quart between my 3,000 mile oil changes).

Make sure that you check your oil and keep on top of that.

Yes, the alternators still fail due to the heat of their position. The best thing that I've found to do is to buy the alternators at the dealer. In my experience, they're much more reliable than the Pep-Boys-Kragen-Autozone specials. But, I've had to replace alternators about every 35,000 miles (we live in Southern California).

The coolant temperature sensor is prone to failure. When you replace it, make sure that you get the replacement from the Saturn dealers. The OEM parts and the third-party replacement sensors are plastic. The Saturn replacement ones are brass - I suspect they're considerably more reliable.

Torque axis mounts go out on those cars. That's the motor mount on the upper right hand side of the engine. Easy DIY job. If you can stick your finger between the top of the mount and the part that attaches to the engine, it's time to replace it. (When you do, make sure that you have the updated studs for the updated mounts. Again, ask the dealer).

Yup. See Above.

They're OK. I like the back support.

Transmissions are VERY good. Replace the filter and fluid every 30,000 miles and you'll be fine.

Ask the dealer about the horn recall.

Reply to
Kirk Kohnen

You're welcome!

Enjoy your "new" car! They're good cars - don't get scared by my comments.

heat/position.

Reply to
Kirk Kohnen

newer model.

burning(like the

cracking

could/would be

Pep-Boys-Kragen-Autozone

Saturn

engine, it's

updated studs

heat/position.

30,000 miles

We have a '96 SL2 with a '97 engine in it. I second everything that Kirk said. Ours has a manual trans, so I can't comment on the auto, but I also second your comments about Kirk and the value of his insight and comments.

Ken

Reply to
Napalm Heart

Ooooh! I have a reputation!

Reply to
Kirk Kohnen

...I think it was that month in a Mexican jail after Labor Day that started it, eh? You party animal, you! (wink)

Reply to
Jonnie Santos

hi we actually decided against buying the 1997 sl2 and went with a private sale

1995 sw2(ac and automatic) with less than 100000kms. the car was bought new at our local saturn dealer and was maintained by them even after the warranty period.the history was very good so this seems like a better(but slightly older)car. hopefully everything kirk said about the 1997 sl2 applies to the 1995 sw2 also. the saturn forums seem to think that the 95 wagons were the best saturn made. anyway thanks for all the info. jeff
Reply to
jeff

Got to put my $.02 in: After working at a Saturn retailer for over 4yrs. a couple thing I can say:

1) Not sure I would call the '95 the best year. The '95's are actually a breed all their own (old body style, but newer style interior; many parts on the '95 are '95 only including the engine).

2) On the '97 the only major problem was the fuel pump (most of which were replaced under warr. for an extended crank condition.

All and all you should be pleased with the improvement that a '97 has over a '92

Saturn Parts Guy

Just remember two words: My opinion

Reply to
P Lynch

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.