I think most people don't realize they are getting screwed when they buy ethanol tainted gasoline. Very few people I know have any idea of their actual fuel economy. And these days ethanol tainted gasoline is not readily identified since there are no requirements that it be labeled as such.
It contraticts nothing I said. My area includes a station near a lake 35 miles away....It is not likely to be cost effective for me to drive 35 miles to fill up. These days I assume any station that doesn't advertise etahnol free gasoline is selling gasoline with ethanol. And unfortunately this is all of the stations I routinely pass. There are more stations closer to the ocean selling ethanol free gasoline, but again it is not economical to drive far out of my normal commute to hunt them down.
As noted above, although there are station in my area advertising ethanol free gas, they are not conveniently located for me to use on a daily basis.
I don't believe this. I keep detail gas mileage records, and despite owning vvehicles with higher EPA rating than in the past, my fuel economy on average is significantly worse.
A 1974 Jensen-Healy I owned literally burned up when the second owner used "gasahol." It degarded the plastic fuel line tee that connected the carburetors and this led to a significant gas leak, followed by a fire(this was a very common problem on those cars). My old chain saw refuses to run properly on gasahol (I finally replaced it with a new one that can handle the crap).
It is my opinion that it is not economic. Provide some proof that my opinion is wrong. Credible sources all seem to agree that at the very best, vehicles get 3% fewer miles per gallon of E-10 (compared to straight gasoline with the same octane and most do significantly worse than jsut a 3% decrease). So even if the per gallon cost is the same for E-10 as for straight gasoline, you are going to spend at least 3% more for fuel. E10 is already subsidized with taxpayer dollars. If you consider the subsidy, and the increased fuel consumption, do you really think you are saving any money by using E10. I don't.
So you want to dump soybeans in a hole in the groud also? A large percentage of soybeans are used for animal feed as well. Do you really want to make the arguement that we should stop feeding corn to animals so we can burn it in cars? And imagine what it does to the economics of ethanol production if there is no market for the left over mash (which is used for animal feed).
Ed