2005 Tacoma - Mistake?

I could be wrong but... everywhere I've looked at what people are saying about the new Tacoma, everyone seems to be so enthusiastic about it....except me. OK, it's going to have a 4.0L engine...but it's also going to weigh more, so where's the benefit? Not to mention rising gas prices, the engine HP of the 3.4L was adequate in my opinion. Why didn't they just put a 4.0L option in the compact version if people thought the 3.4L as being underpowered?

I think Toyota is making a mistake by making the Tacoma bigger.

Doesn't this mean Toyota will no longer be producing a compact truck? Isn't that what they owe their tremendous success in the first place? If it ain't broke...why they fixing it? Why is Toyota messing so much with near perfection?

Oh BTW, I love Toyota's new TV commercials for Tacoma's. Especially the one with the pissed off girlfriend who has her boyfriends Tacoma 4dr. pushed off the cliff.....just to roll over without a scratch. Oh that IS funny! Great commercial.

Reply to
studio
Loading thread data ...

snipped-for-privacy@hotmail.com (studio) wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@posting.google.com:

boyfriends

You're absolutely right. They are behind the curve on this one.

Reply to
MLB

Jeez...

They can't win for loosing.

People cry that Toyotas are smaller than the competition. People cry that Toyotas are underpowered.

Toyota gives people what they want.

People bitch.

--- Rich

formatting link

Reply to
Rich Lockyer

I'm bitching...bring back the Supra!!!!!!!!!!! Else I'm buying a C6 come

2006
Reply to
TacomaDude

I guess it depends on what you want the truck for, vs what feedback Toyota gets from survey groups. Perhaps they feel they're losing a segment of the market that wants to tow larger boats or some such thing.

Reply to
Doug Kanter

Thought that's why they came out with the Tundra DC ... eh?

On Tue, 11 May 2004 14:38:26 GMT, "Doug Kanter" found these unused words floating about:

Reply to
J. A. Mc.

I got a Tacoma because it was a compact truck. The Dakota for example would have been too big and costly for me.

Reply to
Brad P

"Brad P" wrote in news:qf7oc.25792$ snipped-for-privacy@news20.bellglobal.com:

Certainly in the pre-Iraq situation, it was "bigger is better". I'm guessing $2.50 gas changes that. Real quick.

Reply to
MLB

Maybe, but what's the gas mileage difference between a Tundra, and a Tacoma with whatever motor they're about to put in it?

Reply to
Doug Kanter

On Tue, 11 May 2004 18:43:41 GMT, "Doug Kanter" found these unused words floating about:

Probably nil ... so they've got to BIG guzzlers and neither will be suitable for the desert canyon exploring or lumber trails !

I often get where Dakots and full size F&C's fail.

Reply to
J. A. Mc.

I'm with you. Absolutely nothing about a larger Tacoma with a larger engine appeals to me. That's why I'm getting a new 2004 while I still can.

However, it's probably not a mistake on Toyota's part. Americans want bigger, fatter, gas guzzling trucks. So Toyota will likely sell more Tacomas - just that maybe it won't be to the same people who were their previous customers.

It's not hard to find precedent. Look at how big Toyota and Datsun trucks of the late 70's and early 80's were. I wouldn't want a truck that small today. Look at how much larger a Honda Civic or an Accord is compared to what they were 15 years ago.

Reply to
Eli

I just traded in my 2002 Toyota Tacoma 4x4 V6 TRD Off Road ext cab & 5 speed truck for a Chevy Colorado.

I was happy with the Toyota, plus I did consider the V6 motor to have plenty of power for stop & go driving 4X4 off roading hunting etc.

Adding more power to the truck for 2005, heck I won't complain!

I wanted to trade my Toyota in for an 2005 but in a non extended cab version, but still 4x4.

I found some spy pictures of the 05 Tacoma 4x4, & it looked like a Tundra from the side.

For those of you who might not care for how the Tacoma is going to look fo 05, you can still buy older & used one's if you wanted to stay compact.

Josh

formatting link

Reply to
Josh Jona Rael

a v6 with s/c as standard gear would suffice.

Reply to
Kryptoknight

Josh Were you happy with the five speed?

Reply to
Alesandra

at 4" wider and 5" longer, I don't really see the big deal. The extra 50 hp may make some difference, but I'm sure there will be smaller engine options. I personally can't wait to get the new x-runner.

Reply to
?reality

Nope. Tundra DC is simply a version of the Tundra that has room for 5 human beings... not two humans and three children. The towing rating on the DC is the same as the Access Cab... 5000 w/o, and 7000 w/towing package. Total payload is slightly less, as GVW, IIRC, is the same. Same engine, slightly lower gears.

--- Rich

formatting link

Reply to
Rich Lockyer

Had a '76 Datsun. It didn't get much better mileage than my V8 Tundra.

--- Rich

formatting link

Reply to
Rich Lockyer

The new replacement is bigger, uglier, more money(a lot more), and gets worse gas mileage. They're trying to turn it into a mini-F150.

I'd get the 2004 and enjoy the last of the frugal small trucks made by Toyota.

Reply to
Joseph Oberlander

OTOH, I still remember my friend's Chevy LUV 4X4. Little and was a blast off-road.

Reply to
Joseph Oberlander

I'd love to know who their focus groups are. When I was shopping for a truck, the only ones I could find were the TRD versions, which happen to come with tires that are pretty much useless for rain & snow. Now, I haven't a clue about the accuracy of my next statement, but I'll guess and say that at least 2/3 of customers who bought those trucks will never EVER go off-road to any extent, unless a gravel parking lot fits that definition. How about offering customers tires made for the real world?

Reply to
Doug Kanter

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.