Traditional "Plus-Sizing" involves changes of dimensions in two directions: The plus-size rim and tire both get wider, and the sidewall of the tire be comes shorter("lower profile"), maintaining correct speedometer ratios.
My perception of plus-sizing is that the only thing that should change size is the diameter of the rim. The width(side to side) of both the rim and t ire used should remain the same. The only difference is the sidewall of th e new tire will be shorter("lower profile"), to compensate for taller rim a nd maintaining height for correct speedometer.
The advantages of the above:
-The same "looks" of traditional plus-sizing(where all dimensions including width change).
-Less chance of tire/wheel scuffing wheel well or suspension parts while tu rning.
-Better straight-line tracking given the same specs for caster & SAI(kingpi n).
-More weight per contact patch and more longitudinal contact patch(both goo d for negoticating rain and snow).
-Slightly lower weight per wheel than traditional plus-sizing.
So why is this type of plus-sizing(maintaining width of the package but kee ping correct height for speedometer) so hard to accomplish?
-ChrisCoaster