OT - Former CIA director calls Cheney and Condi (and maybe George) liars

You don't know what's in the book then do you?

I never said it was garbage, you said that. I said he has to cover his bare ass with a book. Just like all the other cowardly bums that Bush should have fired a long time ago. Bush isn't ruthless enough. He needs to be like the clintons.

You *are* demeaning the book by saying the author has to cover his ass. Not much different than calling it garbage. In fact, you have no idea what his motives were for writing the book because you haven't read it.

Would you read it if it were given to you for free?

I saw your answer. Get the book when it's available and read it. That's your assignment.

Would you read it if it were given to you for free?

The author has been interviewed. The contents of the interview might give you a hint of the book's contents. Assuming you are rational. But that is probably an incorrect assumption when describing right wingers that still love Bush.

Funny that the Bush administration was the one which fired all of those attorney's between 4 year terms but no other president has done that. Talking about ruthless.

So I guess you are saying that Bush is incompetent because he kept incompetent people working for him. In fact, 64% of the population would agree with you that Bush is indeed incompetent.

Wait a couple of months....

You dims are stepping on your cranks daily.

The latest idiocy of voting to run like a French frog will come back to haunt the dim party

wrong, he should have fired them ALL!! Makes no difference when. They work for the President and he can hire and fire all he wants. The dimmies make steam over it, but that is all, just hot air. They may pay at election time.

Interviewed, of course. Do you know what else he said in his book?

"May?" Being a little more cautious with your words after your rock solid mid-term predictions? lol I don't blame ya'!

How about strength through superior firepower? We've trashed the place, so let's go home and stop providing target practice for them. But we need to leave them with the reminder that we are the big kids on the block and that if there is another terrorist attack in the US, some sandy country or countries are going to be glass. And that warning has to include Saudi Arabia, as well or we will have a 9/11 all over again with no repercussions for them, again. We can't just leave our troops to be targets in the wrong country, so that it looks like we're responding. Right now we've got them right where they want us.

Sounds good to me....

Rev up the nukes......

I wonder if Scott would like nuclear warfare so much if he had ever seen its effects. He might try renting "Hiroshima Mon Amour" sometime and watching the first third of it, in which survivors of Hiroshima are shown. I think he might find it a slightly less attractive alternative to conventional warfare. But probably not, since he'd be apt to look at the film and comment "That's all right....they're only Japs." Most human beings think that nuclear devices should be consigned to the dustbin of history, and should never be used again....but not Scott.

ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh the mushroom cloud over the desert!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Starting a party in your pants with the nuke suggestion, Snott?