You mis-spelled 'vigah'.
Bill Putney (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my address with the letter 'x')
You mis-spelled 'vigah'.
Bill Putney (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my address with the letter 'x')
Jim Quinn always says that liberals' solutions to everything is always a lot more of whatever it is that they have done that's not working.
Bill Putney (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my address with the letter 'x')
Learning from mistakes is not a strong point. They wanted to put the Clinrons back in the White House...
Gee, I guess I can't, huh?
Prove that man went to the moon.
Couple years ago.
From where?
Thanks! You finally actually DID something other than saying, "No, it's not."
I'm from Western Mass where we speak the Queen's English.
I had no choice. Your premeditated and intentional lies had to be crushed. Too bad you're a pussy and can't admit you were wrong about the legislation, its purpose, and who supported expanded oil exploration (all those democrats who voted to PASS the legislation).
Pussy.
Thailand.
I said I would under duress.
I'm waiting to see what the outcome of my original post will be. Beck hasn't said anything about it since. I hate to think of him as a poor source, since he has been reliable in the past.
I will recind what I was going to post as a response to you: Get your head out of MoveOn.org. I guess not all sources can be relied on all the time.
Of course, from my point of view I would have a tendency to rely on Beck more than MoveOn...
So, the BBC and now Beck have left me hanging. One Liberal, one Conservative. Who the hell CAN you trust?!?!?
Hmm. Big Muslim population there. Not.
Why did she need help getting a visa?
I never look at anything from moveon. I gave you links to congressional records. You need no other sources. The records contain the text of the legislation, and the roll call which shows who voted for the legislation. It's absolutely clear that the majority of democrats voted FOR the legislation, not against it. This means the democrats wanted to EXPAND oil drilling, not work against it.
You want the links again, or don't you trust congressional records???
Here in Chicago they're just not getting it, either. Chicago has had GUN CONTROL since 1982 and yet we have an awful lot of gun crime going on. The mayor's response is, of course, that we need MORE gun control. Asinine. (With the price of gas going up, shouldn't that be asiten by now? Elevenis, anyone?)
Charles the Curmudgeon. With apologies to Victor Borge.
The usual BS. The formal excuse was they didn't want her coming here and staying here.
I joked with Lieberman's aide that she wasn't Mexican...
It didn't go over well...
Well, now, how the *HELL* do I do that?
But he's Kennedy! He can walk on water, can't he? He already proved that at Chappaquiddick.
It would be interesting to know the real story.
The aide probably realized you weren't joking.
You can't, which is why you never should've made the claim to begin with.
Here's a reason why INS might be a little twitchy about people coming here from India:
Interesting, because Lieberman is a 'turncoat' having turned his back on the Democrats and is doing quite well on his own, thank you! And he also takes the opposite stand from Kennedy on illegals.
I believe this was right after he left the party, but I can't really remember. The staffer may have been a True Democrat.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required