> > In article
> > ,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > rigger wrote:
> > > > > > > The last paragraph sums it up.
> >
> > > > "Once the Republican ticket was defeated, the time had passed for ad > >
> > > At least Cavett can spruce up his language skills to
> > > please the most perfect critic, such as yourself. You
> > > would have what?...a Masters or Doctorate?
> >
> > > Palin, on the other hand, will always be as dumb
> > > as a rock. The ONLY thing attractive about her
> > > was the clothes; the pubs were on the right track
> > > with that.
> >
> > > dennis
> > > in nca
> >
> > You don't get it.
> >
> > You don't get it at all. You are a reading comprehensive challenged > > individual.
> > --
> >
> > "It's deja vu all over again"
> > Yogi Berra- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> My point is, however, still valid.
>
> Perhaps it's you, as usual, who don't "get" it.
>
> Palin?...Give us all a break. She's stupid, we
> all know it. Give it a rest, ok?
I see you drink the kool-aid well.
She's a hell of a lot smarter than the guy you picked for prez. Now there is real stupid.
> Or, are you saying you was disrespected?
>
> Or you think Cavett's comments make you
> appear "smaller" (larger?), but really, in the
> last analysis, who cares?
>
> dennis
> in nca