Hi all, First off-- thanks to everyone for their recent help on the Code 25 on my '89 Corolla-- indeed it was the O2 sensor. With your help I was able to test and replace it myself (got a new Denso part off Ebay for $22!) and save a lot of money.
Now a tire question-- this is for my wife's 2000 Civic but this would be a question generalizable to any car-- her car has 44k miles on it and its original tires. We use the Corolla 80% of the time, and the Civic mainly for long highway trips, so it sits around a lot and only gets driven about 4-5k miles a year.
I was checking the tires on the Civic and they still have plenty of tread left (maybe 5/16") and are wearing evenly. Around the sidewall of the tires though-- I think it's called the "shoulder", some superficial circumferential wrinkling/cracking has developed. In other words, there's multiple superficial circumferential circular lines going around the sidewall/shoulder area of every tire. By circular, I mean that the diameter of the circles is just slightly smaller than the diameter of the tire. By "superficial," I mean maybe 1/16 of an inch or slightly more. There are no cracks on the actual tread itself. The tires maintain their PSI fine and only need about 1 lb added per month.
information on whether this condition is dangerous or not. "Dry rot" is the term used to describe this I believe. Does the rubber on the sidewall/shoulder area contribute much to the structural integrity of the tire?
We may be moving next year (to what kind of climate I don't know yet) and I was hoping to wait until next year to replace the tires, since 1. the climate where we move may favor one type of new tire over another,
- if we need to sell the car, the buyer might have a certain preference for what kind of tires he/she wants.
A couple people have told me that tires can always be used until they lack sufficient tread, but I don't know if this is always the case.
What do you think? Appreciate your input, John